<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>STB archivos - T21</title>
	<atom:link href="https://t21.us/tag/stb-d96/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://t21.us/tag/stb-d96/</link>
	<description>The leading provider of news in the Transportation and Logistics Sector, including Air, Maritime, Land, and Railway, in Mexico and Latin America.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 21:14:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>CPKC reiterates that the Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern merger is unnecessary</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/cpkc-reiterates-that-the-union-pacific-norfolk-southern-merger-is-unnecessary/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 21:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPKC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAIL TRAFFIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UP-NS FUSION]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=635799</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) insisted that the merger between Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS) is unnecessary and would allow that company to handle almost 50% of freight rail traffic in the United States . Keith Creel, president and chief executive of CPKC, said the railroads&#8217; new application does not change the underlying reality and falls far short of meeting [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/cpkc-reiterates-that-the-union-pacific-norfolk-southern-merger-is-unnecessary/">CPKC reiterates that the Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern merger is unnecessary</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Sin-titulo-7.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="https://www.cpkcr.com/en"><span dir="auto">Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC)</span></a><span dir="auto"> insisted that the merger between </span><a href="https://www.up.com/"><span dir="auto">Union Pacific (UP)</span></a><span dir="auto"> and </span><a href="https://www.norfolksouthern.com/"><span dir="auto">Norfolk Southern (NS)</span></a><span dir="auto"> is unnecessary and would allow that company </span><strong><span dir="auto">to handle almost 50% of freight rail traffic in the United States</span></strong><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Keith Creel, president and chief executive of CPKC, said the railroads&#8217; new application does not change the underlying reality and falls far short of meeting the standards set out in the </span><a href="https://www.stb.gov/"><span dir="auto">Land Transportation Board&#8217;s (STB)</span></a><span dir="auto"> updated 2001 rules on large mergers .</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“A combined UP-NS could place nearly 50% of U.S. freight rail traffic in the hands of a single company that already has a troubled history—some very recent—of abusing market power to the detriment of American businesses and workers. None of this serves the public interest. None of this serves the interests of shippers. All of this puts our supply chains and our economy at unnecessary risk,” Creel said.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">The executive recalled that on May 8, CPKC submitted comments on the integrity of the revised application, noting that </span><strong><span dir="auto">UP and NS did not meet the STB&#8217;s specific requirements</span></strong><span dir="auto"> to submit a detailed analysis of the market impact based on their future projections of participation in rail traffic flows for major freight and corridors.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“This has led us to ask, did UP overlook this specific instruction from the STB? If not, does UP have something to hide? One thing is certain: this is emblematic of UP continuing to have its own interpretation of STB rules and orders, and how they apply to UP,” he commented.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">In this regard, he opined that if the STB accepts the resubmitted request, it will carry out a rigorous regulatory evaluation and review.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/cpkc-reiterates-that-the-union-pacific-norfolk-southern-merger-is-unnecessary/">CPKC reiterates that the Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern merger is unnecessary</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>STB sets date to accept or reject UP-NS merger request</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/stb-sets-date-to-accept-or-reject-up-ns-merger-request/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 23:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusión]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Southern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union Pacific]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=635615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The State Transportation Board (STB) reported that it will announce on May 8 whether the new merger application between Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS) is complete in order to proceed with the proposed transaction. “The board will determine the completeness of the reviewed request; such comments should address only whether it is complete, as comments on the merits of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/stb-sets-date-to-accept-or-reject-up-ns-merger-request/">STB sets date to accept or reject UP-NS merger request</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Sin-titulo.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The </span><a href="https://www.stb.gov/"><span dir="auto">State Transportation Board (STB)</span></a><span dir="auto"> reported that it will announce on May 8 whether the new merger application between </span><a href="https://www.up.com/"><span dir="auto">Union Pacific (UP)</span></a><span dir="auto"> and </span><a href="https://www.norfolksouthern.com/"><span dir="auto">Norfolk Southern (NS)</span></a><span dir="auto"> is complete in order to proceed with the proposed transaction.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“The board will determine the completeness of the reviewed request; such comments should address only whether it is complete, as comments on the merits of the proposed transaction will be sought at a later stage of the proceedings if the board accepts the request,” the agency said.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">He specified that applicants </span><strong><span dir="auto">can submit a response addressing any comments on integrity before May 12</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , so that an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) can initially resolve all disputes for an efficient procedure.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“Interested parties should file any discovery motions as soon as possible to allow the ALJ to resolve discovery disputes expeditiously, and it may rule on any motion on the effective date of this decision,” he explained.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Following this comment and response period, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the STB will make a decision on the completeness of the document</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , either accepting it as complete or rejecting it as incomplete. This determination should not be confused with a determination on the substance of the proposed transaction. If the STB accepts the document, it will issue a procedural timetable for comments on the substance of the proposed transaction.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Similarly, the STB required applicants to redesignate the Company Disclosure Annexes as public.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">For its part, the railway company </span><a href="https://www.bnsf.com/"><span dir="auto">BNSF</span></a><span dir="auto"> reported that it is carefully reviewing the application submitted by UP-NS, which covers approximately seven thousand pages.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“Although our review is still in its early stages, the fundamental premise of the proposed merger appears unchanged. For that reason, we continue to have serious concerns that this transaction is not in the best interests of customers, competition, or the freight rail network as a whole—concerns shared by many other industry stakeholders and government officials,” said Tom G. Williams, the firm’s executive vice president and chief marketing officer.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">He commented that if STB accepts the request, </span><strong><span dir="auto">it will act quickly to establish a formal procedural timeline</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , one of the main reasons being the deadline for clients and interested parties to submit a Notice of Intent to Participate.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">However, he reiterated that </span><strong><span dir="auto">they will provide more information and additional clarity on the procedural review</span></strong><span dir="auto"> established by STB, once they review the document.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/stb-sets-date-to-accept-or-reject-up-ns-merger-request/">STB sets date to accept or reject UP-NS merger request</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>UP defends merger with NS; files new application with US authority</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/up-defends-merger-with-ns-files-new-application-with-us-authority/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MERGER REQUEST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Southern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union Pacific]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=635586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS) filed a new merger application with the Surface Transportation Board (STB) on Thursday, with additional analysis reinforcing that the combination will boost growth, allow substantial savings for carriers, and strengthen the U.S. supply chain. “After completing the additional work requested by the STB, the facts remain clear: This merger enhances competition and delivers real [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/up-defends-merger-with-ns-files-new-application-with-us-authority/">UP defends merger with NS; files new application with US authority</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Sin-titulo-24.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="https://www.up.com/"><span dir="auto">Union Pacific (UP)</span></a><span dir="auto"> and </span><a href="https://www.norfolksouthern.com/"><span dir="auto">Norfolk Southern (NS) </span></a><strong><span dir="auto">filed a new merger application</span></strong><span dir="auto"> with the </span><a href="https://www.stb.gov/"><span dir="auto">Surface Transportation Board (STB) on Thursday,</span></a><span dir="auto"> with additional analysis reinforcing that the combination will boost growth, allow substantial savings for carriers, and strengthen the U.S. supply chain.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“After completing the additional work requested by the STB, the facts remain clear: This merger enhances competition and delivers real public benefits that strengthen America’s supply chain. Our analysis uses comprehensive, system-level traffic data provided by all Class I railroads to identify even more opportunities for our combined railroad to grow and compete,” said Jim Vena, CEO of Union Pacific.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">He asserted that the analysis of the updated application is the first in the history of rail mergers to </span><strong><span dir="auto">use 100% real traffic data</span></strong><span dir="auto"> provided by the six Class I railroads in North America, rather than the sample data available from the STB, making it the most comprehensive assessment of market and operational impacts to date.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Furthermore, </span><strong><span dir="auto">he confirmed that the merger will make rail significantly more competitive with long-haul trucking</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , taking approximately 2.1 million trucks off the road. Shifting freight from trucks to rail will save nearly $3.5 billion annually, benefiting consumers and making American products more affordable. Carriers will also save on inventory and equipment costs through the faster and more reliable service of the combined rail system.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“This merger is fundamentally about growth. Shippers have been clear about what they value, and the data backs it up. When single-track rail service is available, they choose it. Our combined network will offer seamless freight transfers within and across Mississippi Basin markets, with a responsible Class I rail system from origin to destination,” said Mark George, president and CEO of Norfolk Southern.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">It should be recalled that </span><strong><span dir="auto">on January 16, the STB announced its rejection of the application</span></strong><span dir="auto"> and invited both companies to submit a revised application addressing the deficiencies identified in the decision. The STB specified that the railway companies must include a comprehensive system impact analysis, market share projections for the entity to be created through the transaction, and the complete merger agreement, including the submission of any contracts or other written instruments related to the transaction.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">According to their current analysis, the UP-NS combination is an end-to-end merger that connects the eastern and western United States </span><strong><span dir="auto">with the goal of achieving growth through new routes and improved service</span></strong><span dir="auto"> that eliminates interchange transfers that can add 24 to 48 hours and costs to the supply chain.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">To address the additional growth opportunities identified with stronger Class I traffic data, the amended application increases the projected number of new premium intermodal lanes operating seven days a week from six to seven, with a new lane connecting Northern California and the Southeast. “The combined company will have sufficient equipment and infrastructure capacity to support projected growth.”</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Furthermore, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the document confirms that the merger will preserve customer access to competitive rail alternatives</span></strong><span dir="auto"> and will not have a significant impact on geographic competition or the availability of independent routes.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“Our projections show that the combined rail will travel roughly the same number of ton-miles as our western competitor today, underscoring how this merger will increase competition in the market. That competition will drive innovation and help reduce costs—benefits that American carriers and consumers will feel directly,” Vena said.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Additionally, </span><strong><span dir="auto">it will also generate more well-paid union jobs</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , as the combined company is estimated to need 1,200 new union jobs by the third year of the merger to manage new business, up from 900 in the original request. “This growth adds to the unprecedented guarantee of lifetime jobs.”</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">“As requested by the STB, the amended application includes more detailed market share projections that account for the growth the combined railroad expects to achieve as carriers shift truck and other rail traffic to its faster, more reliable coast-to-coast service. The analysis confirms what we’ve been saying: our merger will generate strong growth by </span><strong><span dir="auto">offering customers a superior service product,</span></strong><span dir="auto"> which in itself creates competition in the rail industry. The announcement of our merger alone has prompted other railroads to respond with new bids,” George commented.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Both parties </span><strong><span dir="auto">asserted that the updated application complies with the guidelines</span></strong><span dir="auto"> and presents an even stronger argument for why the United States needs a seamless, coast-to-coast railroad to revitalize the rail industry. The transaction remains subject to review and approval by the State Transportation Board (STB) within its statutory timeframe.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/up-defends-merger-with-ns-files-new-application-with-us-authority/">UP defends merger with NS; files new application with US authority</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern will submit a new application to STB in April.</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-will-submit-a-new-application-to-stb-in-april-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 22:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusión]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Southern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAILWAY PROJECTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union Pacific]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=633831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Union Pacific (UP) informed the Land Transportation Board (STB) that  it will submit a new application for its merger with Norfolk Southern (NS) on April 30 . In a letter sent to the aforementioned organization, UP indicated that the decision was due to the fact that the first document submitted was considered incomplete by that regulatory authority. “Union Pacific Corporation, Union [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-will-submit-a-new-application-to-stb-in-april-2/">Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern will submit a new application to STB in April.</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Sin-titulo-12.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="https://www.up.com/"><span dir="auto">Union Pacific (UP)</span></a><span dir="auto"> informed the </span><a href="https://www.stb.gov/"><span dir="auto">Land Transportation Board (STB)</span></a><span dir="auto"> that  it will submit a new application for its merger with <strong><a href="https://www.norfolksouthern.com/">Norfolk Southern (NS)</a></strong></span><strong><span dir="auto"> on April 30</span></strong><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In a letter sent to the aforementioned organization, UP indicated that the decision was due to the fact that the first document submitted was considered incomplete by that regulatory authority.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“Union Pacific Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company are submitting this letter to inform the Board that they anticipate submitting a revised application on April 30, 2026,” the letter dated February 17 stated.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">It is worth remembering that on January 16, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the STB reported that it rejected the request</span></strong><span dir="auto"> and invited both companies to submit another one that addresses the deficiencies noted in the decision.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The STB specified that railway companies </span><strong><span dir="auto">must include a full system impact analysis</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , market share projections for the entity to be created through the transaction, and the full merger agreement, including the submission of any contract or other written instrument relating to the transaction.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In addition to actual and projected market shares of certain revenues and traffic volumes that demonstrate, among other things, the impact of the transaction on competition, to name a few.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“In the application, the railway companies project that the merger will result in traffic growth, including diversions, and state that the full impact of the transaction will not be realized until three years after completion. However, they present as projected market shares only the sum of the estimated actual market shares of UP and NS for 2023. The application does not contain future market share projections that show the combined effects of merger-related growth, diversions, and merger-influenced changes, as well as other changes in market conditions that the applicants anticipate,” STB stated at the time.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">In addition to those problems, the authority </span><strong><span dir="auto">identified further deficiencies in the application</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , such as the control of the St. Louis Railroad Association Terminal, since it is a significant transaction, not a minor one; &#8220;the decision identifies several technical and minor aspects that must be addressed in any reviewed application.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The US railroads filed their merger application on December 19, 2025, a nearly 7,000-page document that includes a record 2,000 letters of support from stakeholders, joining shareholders of both companies who cast votes with 99% in favor of the merger.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/evangelina-del-toro-31b8104b/"><span dir="auto">@Evangelina del Toro</span></a><span dir="auto">  /  </span><a id="menurj3" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-ny-medios/" href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Link @GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-will-submit-a-new-application-to-stb-in-april-2/">Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern will submit a new application to STB in April.</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern will submit a new application to STB in April.</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-will-submit-a-new-application-to-stb-in-april/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 19:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusión]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Southern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAILWAY PROJECTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union Pacific]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=633813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Union Pacific (UP) informed the Land Transportation Board (STB) that  it will submit a new application for its merger with Norfolk Southern (NS) on April 30 . In a letter sent to the aforementioned organization, UP indicated that the decision was due to the fact that the first document submitted was considered incomplete by that regulatory authority. “Union Pacific Corporation, Union [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-will-submit-a-new-application-to-stb-in-april/">Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern will submit a new application to STB in April.</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Sin-titulo-12.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="https://www.up.com/"><span dir="auto">Union Pacific (UP)</span></a><span dir="auto"> informed the </span><a href="https://www.stb.gov/"><span dir="auto">Land Transportation Board (STB)</span></a><span dir="auto"> that  it will submit a new application for its merger with <strong><a href="https://www.norfolksouthern.com/">Norfolk Southern (NS)</a></strong></span><strong><span dir="auto"> on April 30</span></strong><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In a letter sent to the aforementioned organization, UP indicated that the decision was due to the fact that the first document submitted was considered incomplete by that regulatory authority.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“Union Pacific Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company are submitting this letter to inform the Board that they anticipate submitting a revised application on April 30, 2026,” the letter dated February 17 stated.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">It is worth remembering that on January 16, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the STB reported that it rejected the request</span></strong><span dir="auto"> and invited both companies to submit another one that addresses the deficiencies noted in the decision.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The STB specified that railway companies </span><strong><span dir="auto">must include a full system impact analysis</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , market share projections for the entity to be created through the transaction, and the full merger agreement, including the submission of any contract or other written instrument relating to the transaction.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In addition to actual and projected market shares of certain revenues and traffic volumes that demonstrate, among other things, the impact of the transaction on competition, to name a few.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“In the application, the railway companies project that the merger will result in traffic growth, including diversions, and state that the full impact of the transaction will not be realized until three years after completion. However, they present as projected market shares only the sum of the estimated actual market shares of UP and NS for 2023. The application does not contain future market share projections that show the combined effects of merger-related growth, diversions, and merger-influenced changes, as well as other changes in market conditions that the applicants anticipate,” STB stated at the time.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">In addition to those problems, the authority </span><strong><span dir="auto">identified further deficiencies in the application</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , such as the control of the St. Louis Railroad Association Terminal, since it is a significant transaction, not a minor one; &#8220;the decision identifies several technical and minor aspects that must be addressed in any reviewed application.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The US railroads filed their merger application on December 19, 2025, a nearly 7,000-page document that includes a record 2,000 letters of support from stakeholders, joining shareholders of both companies who cast votes with 99% in favor of the merger.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/evangelina-del-toro-31b8104b/"><span dir="auto">@Evangelina del Toro</span></a><span dir="auto">  /  </span><a id="menurj3" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-ny-medios/" href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Link @GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-will-submit-a-new-application-to-stb-in-april/">Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern will submit a new application to STB in April.</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>UP-NS merger will bring risks to the rail industry: BNSF</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/https-t21-com-mx-fusion-up-ns-traera-riesgos-a-la-industria-ferroviaria-bnsf-texthome-railway-up-ns-merger-will-bring-risks-to-the-rail-industry-bnsf-after-revie/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 19:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSF Railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAILWAYS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUPPLY CHIAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UP-NSC MERGER]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=632948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>BNSF Railway reiterated that the merger between Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS) presents serious risks to competition, service and the supply chain . According to Tom G. Williams, executive vice president and chief marketing officer of BNSF Railway, he noted the above after reviewing the merger application that the companies submitted to the United States Land Transportation Board (STB) on December 19, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/https-t21-com-mx-fusion-up-ns-traera-riesgos-a-la-industria-ferroviaria-bnsf-texthome-railway-up-ns-merger-will-bring-risks-to-the-rail-industry-bnsf-after-revie/">UP-NS merger will bring risks to the rail industry: BNSF</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Sin-titulo1.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="https://www.bnsf.com/"><span dir="auto">BNSF Railway</span></a><span dir="auto"> reiterated that the merger between </span><a href="https://www.up.com/"><span dir="auto">Union Pacific (UP)</span></a><span dir="auto"> and </span><a href="https://www.norfolksouthern.com/"><span dir="auto">Norfolk Southern (NS)</span></a><span dir="auto"> presents </span><strong><span dir="auto">serious risks to competition, service and the supply chain</span></strong><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">According to Tom G. Williams, executive vice president and chief marketing officer of BNSF Railway, he noted the above after reviewing the merger application that the companies submitted to the </span><a href="https://www.stb.gov/"><span dir="auto">United States Land Transportation Board (STB)</span></a><span dir="auto"> on December 19, 2025.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In a letter sent to its customers, it mentioned that the growth promises </span><strong><span dir="auto">presented by the companies are unrealistic</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , since the combined volumes of UP and NS alone have decreased by 13% in the last decade.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">However, the first one promises 12% growth in just three years, almost entirely thanks to the conversion of truck carriers to rail carriers.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“STB statistics show that UP already earns more revenue from higher fares than any other Class I railroad. When this growth in truck conversion doesn&#8217;t materialize, you&#8217;ll pay for their merger premiums with higher fares. The protections proposed by UP are a Trojan horse designed to get their application approved,” he emphasized.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Regarding the Gateway Tariff Commitment proposed by UP, he considered that </span><strong><span dir="auto">it excludes almost all shippers</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . Only 0.4% of all rail freight transport would be eligible. Furthermore, it expires in a few years, “leaving you vulnerable to monopoly pricing.”</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Williams also indicated that integration risks exist due to UP and NS&#8217;s &#8220;trust us&#8221; approach, which does not offer fundamental safeguards against serious supply chain disruptions on a much larger scale.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“The last time UP led a merger integration in 2008, the STB had to extend its oversight period twice due to the congestion problems it caused in Chicago,” he recalled.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">He noted that </span><strong><span dir="auto">the UP-NS merger request cites more than two thousand letters of support</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , including some 500 from shippers, representing less than 6% of all traffic on the U.S. rail network.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In contrast, the Rail Customers Coalition—which represents carriers of more than half of all rail freight volume—has stated that </span><strong><span dir="auto">the merger would create near-monopoly power</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , increasing costs for manufacturers, farmers, energy producers, and ultimately, consumers. Similarly, the </span><a href="https://teamster.org/divisions/rail-conference/"><span dir="auto">Teamsters Rail Conference</span></a><span dir="auto"> and the </span><a href="https://www.brs.org/"><span dir="auto">Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen</span></a><span dir="auto"> , which together represent more than half of all rail workers, warn that the merger would reduce competitiveness and increase safety risks.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“These numbers matter. The voices opposing the merger represent the vast majority of customers and rail workers who interact with UP and NS on a daily basis. As more stakeholders review the application, opposition is growing. The application is so lacking in substance that several key players have already asked the STB to reject it as incomplete. When the STB finally accepts the application as complete, it will publish a timetable that will include a short comment period. This will be your opportunity to raise your voice and protect your interests,” he stated.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on X:  </span><a href="https://twitter.com/GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<div class="jeg_ad jeg_ad_article jnews_content_inline_2_ads ">
<div class="ads-wrapper align-center "></div>
</div>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/https-t21-com-mx-fusion-up-ns-traera-riesgos-a-la-industria-ferroviaria-bnsf-texthome-railway-up-ns-merger-will-bring-risks-to-the-rail-industry-bnsf-after-revie/">UP-NS merger will bring risks to the rail industry: BNSF</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern submit merger application to STB</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-submit-merger-application-to-stb/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 23:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusión]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Southern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAILWAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union Pacific]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=632744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NSC) submitted their application to the Surface Transportation Board (STB) on Friday , requesting approval to merge the two U.S. railroads. The application, nearly seven thousand pages long, includes a record two thousand letters of support from stakeholders, joining shareholders of both companies who cast 99% of their votes in favor of the merger. “We [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-submit-merger-application-to-stb/">Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern submit merger application to STB</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Sin-titulo-16.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="https://www.up.com/"><span dir="auto">Union Pacific (UP)</span></a><span dir="auto"> and </span><a href="https://norfolksouthern.com/"><span dir="auto">Norfolk Southern (NSC) </span></a><strong><span dir="auto">submitted their application</span></strong><span dir="auto"> to the </span><a href="https://www.stb.gov/"><span dir="auto">Surface Transportation Board (STB)</span></a><span dir="auto"> on Friday , requesting approval to merge the two U.S. railroads.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The application, nearly seven thousand pages long, includes a record two thousand letters of support from stakeholders, joining shareholders of both companies who cast 99% of their votes in favor of the merger.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“We look forward to working with the Board as it reviews our historic application to create America’s first transcontinental railroad. As time and technology continue to transform how goods are delivered, our industry must keep pace and move forward, reaching underserved markets with new rail solutions and strengthening America’s supply chain,” said Jim Vena, CEO of UP.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">He noted that </span><strong><span dir="auto">this merger will connect the United States from coast to coast</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , transforming 10,000 existing interline service routes into a faster and more efficient single-line service, eliminating time-consuming transfers between railroads.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">It will also eliminate approximately 2,400 railcars and containers and 60,000 rail-miles each day, competing more effectively with long-distance road transport, converting about two million road freight loads to rail annually.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In addition, it will provide one-way access to more than 100 ports connecting to global markets and </span><strong><span dir="auto">10 international gateways to markets in Canada and Mexico.</span></strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong><span dir="auto">“</span></strong><span dir="auto"> This combination will bring together UP’s extensive western reach and NS’s unmatched access to the East’s manufacturing and population centers in an end-to-end combination. It will create a coherent freight rail solution with 50,000 miles of routes connecting 43 states and more than 100 ports,” said Mark George, president and CEO of Norfolk Southern.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Following this announcement, </span><a href="https://www.cpkcr.com/en"><span dir="auto">Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC)</span></a><span dir="auto"> announced that it formally received the UP-NS merger request and will review it thoroughly in the coming days.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“We will examine the application from at least two perspectives: whether it complies with the Board’s 2001 Major Merger Rules and whether it provides the STB and stakeholders with an adequate basis for assessing the public interest consequences of the proposed UP-NS merger,” he said.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">He mentioned that the first step in the STB&#8217;s merger review process is to determine, </span><strong><span dir="auto">before January 18, 2026, whether to accept the application</span></strong><span dir="auto"> for consideration or reject it as incomplete.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“If approved, the merger would pose extraordinary and far-reaching risks to customers, rail employees, and supply chains in general. We are confident that the STB will conduct a rigorous process to assess all the short- and long-term impacts on the public interest of this proposed behemoth, including the competition that rail customers face today,” he said.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Meanwhile, Katie Farmer, president and CEO of </span><a href="https://www.bnsf.com/"><span dir="auto">BNSF</span></a><span dir="auto"> , commented that they are reviewing the STB&#8217;s presentation, although she clarified that </span><strong><span dir="auto">&#8220;so far, BNSF&#8217;s opposition to the proposed merger remains unchanged.&#8221;</span></strong></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“The transaction poses a significant threat to the American economy and consumers due to its long-term competitive disadvantages. It would leave carriers with fewer options, leading to higher fares and ultimately higher prices for consumers. This did not begin with customers calling for this merger, and the claimed public benefits appear to accrue primarily to shareholders. Past mergers demonstrate the risk of serious service disruptions with destructive impacts on customers, the rail network, and the nation’s economy,” he said.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on X:  </span><a href="https://twitter.com/GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<div class="jeg_ad jeg_ad_article jnews_content_inline_2_ads  ">
<div class="ads-wrapper align-center "></div>
</div>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-submit-merger-application-to-stb/">Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern submit merger application to STB</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>BNSF warns of supply chain impacts from potential UP-NSC merger</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/bnsf-warns-of-supply-chain-impacts-from-potential-up-nsc-merger/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 00:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPKC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply Chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UP-NSC MERGER]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=630871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. railroad NSF Railway has ruled that the potential merger between  Union Pacific (UP)  and  Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) is unnecessary, anti-competitive, and would increase rates, impacting the U.S. supply chain. “Our nation&#8217;s supply chain does not need the reduction in competitive options or the inherent integration risk we have seen occur after nearly every Class I merger. No customer is [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/bnsf-warns-of-supply-chain-impacts-from-potential-up-nsc-merger/">BNSF warns of supply chain impacts from potential UP-NSC merger</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Sin-titulo1.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The U.S. railroad </span><a href="https://www.bnsf.com/"><span dir="auto">NSF </span></a><a href="https://www.bnsf.com/"><span dir="auto">Railway</span></a><span dir="auto"> has ruled that the potential merger between </span><a href="https://www.up.com/"><span dir="auto"> Union Pacific (UP)</span></a><span dir="auto">  and  </span><a href="https://www.norfolksouthern.com/"><span dir="auto">Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC)</span></a><span dir="auto"> is unnecessary, anti-competitive, and would increase rates, impacting the U.S. supply chain.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“Our nation&#8217;s supply chain does not need the reduction in competitive options or the inherent integration risk we have seen occur after nearly every Class I merger. No customer is requesting a merger between UP and NS. It is driven by Wall Street with the promise of a large payout for shareholders,” the firm said in a filing.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Among the impacts, he said, the merger is expected to </span><strong><span dir="auto">concentrate control of the country&#8217;s freight transport market</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in a single railroad, which would lead to long-term harm to competition and resilience in the national supply chain.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">According to the railroad, the merger between UP and NSC </span><strong><span dir="auto">would control 45% of the total U.S. tonnage</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , compared to the recent merger that created </span><a href="https://www.cpkcr.com/es"><span dir="auto">Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , which resulted in control of 5% of the U.S. market.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In that sense, he emphasized that such a merger </span><strong><span dir="auto">would bring less competition</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , meaning fewer alternatives and higher fares, as well as a reduction in capital investment across the entire rail industry.</span></p>
<div class="jeg_ad jeg_ad_article jnews_content_inline_3_ads  "></div>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">&#8220;The revenue and efficiency gains claimed to justify the merger&#8217;s excessive premium simply don&#8217;t add up. Carriers will cover the $85 billion merger price tag, despite UP&#8217;s claims that it will be paid for through 10% growth over three years,&#8221; he said.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">He also noted that UP has a history of increasing traffic fares and aggressively cutting costs, which will impact the entire supply chain, which is why industries such as the chemical and agricultural industries are actively opposing this merger.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“Truckload and agricultural customers will be the most affected, as they will lose the option to ship goods to the eastern United States or face significantly higher rates on traffic currently exchanged with NSC,” he said.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="https://www.stb.gov/"><span dir="auto">He reported that, according to Surface Transportation Board (STB)</span></a><span dir="auto"> data , a combined UP-NSC railroad </span><strong><span dir="auto">would control 50% of the chemical market</span></strong><span dir="auto"> (higher prices for consumer goods), as well as 50% of the metals market (higher construction costs) and 50% of lumber (higher housing costs).</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The railroad company stated that </span><strong><span dir="auto">if this merger were to materialize, 300 intermodal lanes would be closed</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . It recalled that after the last major round of mergers alone, 90 such facilities were closed.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“BNSF does not believe that the appropriate competitive response is to acquire </span><a href="https://www.csx.com/"><span dir="auto">CSX</span></a><span dir="auto"> at this time. We should not be seen as the solution to correct the competitive imbalance that UP-NS is trying to create. Wall Street and UP would like to force BNSF into a competitive merger that would establish a coast-to-coast duopoly controlling over 90% of our nation&#8217;s rail traffic,” he stated.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">He explained that the supply chain in general wants and needs greater collaboration between railroads and shared customers, greater technological innovation, and more strategic investments through privately funded infrastructure, as is being done with the Barstow International Gateway and the recent announcement with CSX.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">He argued that these alliances provide more options while preserving competition and flexibility.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">&#8220;BNSF must continue to offer competitive and efficient transportation services and grow alongside our customers. This requires competition, which is not possible with a dominant railroad resulting from the proposed UP-NS merger,&#8221; he emphasized.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on X:  </span><a href="https://twitter.com/evandeltoro"><span dir="auto">@evandeltoro</span></a><span dir="auto">  /  </span><a href="https://twitter.com/GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/bnsf-warns-of-supply-chain-impacts-from-potential-up-nsc-merger/">BNSF warns of supply chain impacts from potential UP-NSC merger</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern notify STB of intent to merge</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-notify-stb-of-intent-to-merge/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 23:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Railway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPKC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intermodal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAILWAY NETWORK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UP-NSC MERGER]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=629538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Surface Transportation Board (STB) has received a notice of intent regarding the proposed merger between Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) , initiating the regulatory review process for the combination of two Class I railroads. The petitioners stated that on July 28, they entered into an agreement and plan of merger under which UP, through a wholly owned subsidiary, would acquire all [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-notify-stb-of-intent-to-merge/">Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern notify STB of intent to merge</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Sin-titulo-22.jpg" /></p>
<div class="jeg_viewport">
<div class="post-wrapper">
<div class="post-wrap">
<div class="jeg_main ">
<div class="jeg_container">
<div class="jeg_content jeg_singlepage">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="jeg_main_content col-md-8">
<div class="jeg_inner_content">
<div class="entry-content no-share">
<div class="content-inner ">
<p>The <a href="https://www.stb.gov/">Surface Transportation Board (STB)</a> has received a notice of intent regarding the proposed merger between <a href="https://www.up.com/">Union Pacific (UP)</a> and <a href="https://www.norfolksouthern.com/">Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC)</a> , initiating <strong>the regulatory review process</strong> for the combination of two Class I railroads.</p>
<p>The petitioners stated that on July 28, <strong>they entered into an agreement and plan of merger</strong> under which UP, through a wholly owned subsidiary, would acquire all of NSC&#8217;s outstanding shares in exchange for consideration consisting of NSC&#8217;s common shares and cash.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If the STB approves the upcoming application, and upon receiving shareholder approval and meeting customary closing requirements, NSC would become a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of UP. The applicants state in their notice of intent that they do not contemplate the use of a voting trust,&#8221; he stated.</p></blockquote>
<p>Under the board&#8217;s key merger regulations, the notice of intent, also known as a pre-filing notice, <strong>initiates a timeline for both railroads to file a merger application within three to six months</strong> .</p>
<p>In this regard, the STB received the notification on July 30, and the applicants declare that they intend to <strong>submit their application on or before January 29, 2026</strong> .</p>
<p>The agency must publish a notice of the pre-filing notification in the Federal Register within 30 days. If an application is timely filed, its completeness will be determined and a procedural schedule for the review process will be issued.</p>
<p>According to their STB filing, the applicants believe that a combination of UP and NSC <strong>represents an unprecedented opportunity</strong> to create America&#8217;s first transcontinental railroad, transforming the American supply chain, boosting the industrial strength of American manufacturing, and creating new sources of economic growth and job opportunities.</p>
<blockquote><p>“UP and NSC have highly complementary networks. Current customers of both railroads will benefit from a faster, more efficient, and more reliable network that offers single-line service from coast to coast, connecting approximately 100 ports and nearly every corner of North America. This combination will provide new rail options for shippers in regions where rail connections are less efficient, such as the Ohio Valley and on both sides of the Mississippi River, creating a more accessible, sustainable, and lower-cost supply chain for manufacturers and consumers,” they noted.</p></blockquote>
<p>They also stated that the merger will result in increased rail volume, generating additional employment opportunities and allowing them to compete more effectively with Canadian railroads to regain freight volume from the United States.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth remembering that on July 29, UP and NSC announced <strong>a merger agreement, valued at $85 billion</strong> , which would make it the first transcontinental railroad in the United States.</p>
<p>According to the companies, the combination will create a rail network worth more than $250 billion, with a network of 50,000 miles <strong>(just over 80,000 kilometers)</strong> serving 43 states from the East Coast to the West Coast of the United States, and connecting to approximately 100 ports and reaching nearly every corner of North America.</p>
<p>The STB&#8217;s last merger approval came in 2023, when it agreed to the combination of Canadian Pacific (CP) and Kansas City Southern (KCS) (now <a href="https://www.cpkcr.com/es">Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC)</a> , although it imposed <strong>an unprecedented seven-year oversight period</strong> containing numerous conditions intended to mitigate environmental impact, preserve competition, protect rail workers, and promote efficient passenger rail.</p>
<p>Upon learning of the news, Keith Creel, CPKC&#8217;s president and CEO, stated that they will continue to pursue their value proposition, as &#8220;it is a unique and powerful network, the only one connecting the United States, Canada, and Mexico, <strong>a network that will continue to drive differentiated growth</strong> , and a management team that undoubtedly has the track record of execution to back up our actions with our words.&#8221;</p>
<p>Therefore, he said, the value and strength of his network &#8220;puts us in a very unique position that has allowed us to produce what we&#8217;ve produced in the last two years; that doesn&#8217;t change. And similarly, our multi-year outlook and value proposition haven&#8217;t changed. The team and the network will continue to deliver differentiated results.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>“We are dealing with a regulator who takes their job very seriously. They will be pragmatic. They will be diligent. They will be fact-based. I believe they will base their decisions on the facts that unfold, the truths that are represented and presented, and they will be debated and discussed in a very thorough manner to achieve the right results,” he said.</p></blockquote>
<p>However, he emphasized that in intermodal services, if the merger goes through, the alliance would not threaten their single-line segment. Furthermore, <strong>they would not have a network in Canada</strong> , &#8220;that&#8217;s where we&#8217;re strong. We play to the strength of our network. We have the shortest routes in the most key markets, and we do extremely well with premium service in Canada.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Likewise, he emphasized, the same applies to <strong>the Chicago-to-Mexico route, whose proposal doesn&#8217;t affect</strong> the route. &#8220;I don&#8217;t feel threatened by that at all, but this isn&#8217;t just about a single-line service. This is about much more than that. And again, all the facts need to be made known and understood in relation not only to UP and NSC and their customers, who would benefit from this, but also in relation to a duopoly system of railroads in North America. The outcome of that will be determined by the regulator.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Comment and follow us on X:  <a href="https://twitter.com/evandeltoro">@evandeltoro</a>  /  <a href="https://twitter.com/GrupoT21">@GrupoT21</a></p>
<div class="jeg_ad jeg_ad_article jnews_content_inline_2_ads "></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-notify-stb-of-intent-to-merge/">Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern notify STB of intent to merge</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
