<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Semar archivos - T21</title>
	<atom:link href="https://t21.us/tag/semar-d18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://t21.us/tag/semar-d18/</link>
	<description>The leading provider of news in the Transportation and Logistics Sector, including Air, Maritime, Land, and Railway, in Mexico and Latin America.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 22:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Oil spill under investigation off the port of Manzanillo</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/oil-spill-under-investigation-off-the-port-of-manzanillo/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 22:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asipona Manzanillo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HYDROCARBON SPILL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEMEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PORT OF MAZANILLO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SECRETARIAT OF THE NAVY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=636304</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The presence of an oil slick in Manzanillo Bay mobilized maritime, port, and environmental authorities, as well as Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex) , who are conducting an investigation to determine the origin of the hydrocarbon detected on June 2nd in the vicinity of the tourist pier and the Maritime Terminal of the state-owned company. According to the Mexican Navy (Semar) , the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/oil-spill-under-investigation-off-the-port-of-manzanillo/">Oil spill under investigation off the port of Manzanillo</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Mancha-Manzanillo-750x561-2.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The presence of an oil slick in Manzanillo Bay mobilized maritime, port, and environmental authorities, as well as </span><a href="https://www.pemex.com/Paginas/default.aspx"><span dir="auto">Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , who are conducting an investigation to determine </span><strong><span dir="auto">the origin of the hydrocarbon detected on June 2nd</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in the vicinity of the tourist pier and the Maritime Terminal of the state-owned company.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">According to the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Mexican Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , the contingency resulted in the activation of the Local Contingency Plan for Spills of Hydrocarbons and Potentially Hazardous Noxious Substances in Mexican Marine Zones, after the </span><a href="https://www.puertomanzanillo.com.mx/espi/0000001/inicio.php"><span dir="auto">National Port System Administration (Asipona) Manzanillo</span></a><span dir="auto"> reported the </span><strong><span dir="auto">presence of the contaminant in waters near the city&#8217;s historic center.</span></strong></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">The first inspections carried out by specialized personnel made it possible to identify </span><strong><span dir="auto">&#8220;scattered patches of surface iridescence in the water&#8221;</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , which were concentrated around the perimeter barriers of the Pemex Maritime Terminal, a situation that triggered the application of response protocols to contain a possible environmental impact.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">As part of the emergency response, the Mexican Navy (Semar) deployed a joint operation with the Pacific Naval Force, the Fourteenth Naval Zone, and ASIPONA Manzanillo to </span><strong><span dir="auto">carry out cleanup efforts</span></strong><span dir="auto"> and determine whether the presence of the hydrocarbon was due to an isolated incident or a continuous source of contamination. The response included the deployment of 200 meters of containment booms from the Mexican Navy ship “Comala,” with support from a tugboat, two Defender-class vessels from the Naval Search, Rescue, and Maritime Surveillance Station (ENSAR), and a Go-Fast vessel.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">These efforts were complemented </span><strong><span dir="auto">by the installation of an additional 270 meters of barriers</span></strong><span dir="auto"> as structural support for the containment work, along with another 450 meters placed at the Pemex Maritime Terminal. Naval authorities stated that the cleanup and recovery of the hydrocarbons continues, with the goal of preventing or mitigating damage to the marine ecosystem.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">As containment efforts in the water progressed, Pemex reported that it is maintaining inter-institutional coordination to help identify the source of the oil spill. The company stated that personnel from the Federal Maritime Guard, Asipona Manzanillo, the Mexican Navy, and Pemex itself conducted </span><strong><span dir="auto">verification tours of docks, beach pipelines, and facilities</span></strong><span dir="auto"> at the maritime terminal.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">As a result of the inspections carried out on June 2 and 3, Pemex assured that &#8220;the facilities are operating under normal conditions and without evidence of damage or incidents associated with the event,&#8221; ruling out so far any indications that directly link the contingency to a visible failure in its infrastructure.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The company also reported that it is maintaining constant coordination with the Mexican Navy, Asipona Manzanillo, and other relevant authorities to </span><strong><span dir="auto">monitor the investigations</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . It also announced a new pipeline inspection with the participation of the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semarnat"><span dir="auto">Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (Semarnat)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/profepa"><span dir="auto">Federal Attorney for Environmental Protection (Profepa)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , Asipona, and Civil Protection, as part of the efforts to determine the origin of the hydrocarbon.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In its statement, Pemex reiterated &#8220;its commitment to protecting the environment, the safety of its operations, and the timely attention to any situation that could represent a risk to the communities and ecosystems where it carries out its activities,&#8221; while the investigations continue.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">For its part, the Mexican Navy emphasized that the central purpose of activating the contingency plan is </span><strong><span dir="auto">“to establish actions for the containment and recovery of the oil spill</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in the sea in the shortest possible time to prevent or mitigate damage and pollution to the marine environment.” In this regard, the agency reaffirmed its commitment to protecting the marine environment and ensuring the safety of port activities, in a situation that keeps authorities under close observation while the origin of the substance that reached the waters of Manzanillo Bay is determined.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/oil-spill-under-investigation-off-the-port-of-manzanillo/">Oil spill under investigation off the port of Manzanillo</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vehicle traffic through Mexican ports decreases in March</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/vehicle-traffic-through-mexican-ports-decreases-in-march/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 19:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Altamira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lázaro Cárdenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAZATLÁN MOBILIZATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEXICAN PORTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATIONAL PORT SYSTEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCEAN FREIGHT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuxpan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veracruz]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=635192</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>According to statistics from the National Port System of the  Secretariat of the Navy (Semar) , in March 2026 the movement of vehicles through Mexican ports fell by 3.5% compared to the same month in 2025 with 184,829 units, thus failing to recover from the decrease recorded last February, when it fell 20.9% year-on-year. Although some ports reported declines in car [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/vehicle-traffic-through-mexican-ports-decreases-in-march/">Vehicle traffic through Mexican ports decreases in March</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Puerto-de-Lazaro-Cardenas-automoviles-edr.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">According to statistics from the National Port System of the  </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Secretariat of the Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , </span><strong><span dir="auto">in March 2026 </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">the movement of vehicles through Mexican ports </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">fell by 3.5% compared to the same month in 2025</span></strong><span dir="auto"> with 184,829 units, thus failing to recover from the decrease recorded last February, when it fell 20.9% year-on-year.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Although some ports reported declines in car traffic in the third month of the year, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the port of Veracruz showed a 33.2% increase</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to March 2025, handling 82,185 units. Tuxpan, also in Veracruz, saw a 15.8% increase, with 3,804 units moved during the period, according to an analysis by </span><a href="https://t21.com.mx/"><span dir="auto">T21 Business Intelligence</span></a><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In contrast, the port of </span><strong><span dir="auto">Mazatlán, in Sinaloa, handled </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">8,778 units in March 2026, </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">46.6% less than in the third month of 2025</span></strong><span dir="auto"> ; Altamira, in Tamaulipas, fell 27.1% with 38,149 vehicles moved; while the port of Lázaro Cárdenas, in Michoacán, declined 8.6% with the movement of 51,913 units in the reference period.</span></p>
<p><iframe id="datawrapper-chart-HljIA" title="Monthly car traffic per port 2026" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/HljIA/1/" width="600" height="372" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Multiple Columns" data-external="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-31="true" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The negative figures recorded by several ports impacted the cumulative total for January-March 2026. </span><strong><span dir="auto">The first quarter of the year saw a 4% contraction compared to the same period in 2025, with 441,765 vehicles handled</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . During the period, the port of Veracruz was the only one with positive numbers, reporting a 22.3% year-on-year increase with 171,598 units handled.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Conversely, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Tuxpan saw a 24.7% drop in the cumulative total for the first three months of 2026 compared to the same period last year</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , with 6,637 vehicles moved. Altamira declined 19.1% with 89,461 units; and Lázaro Cárdenas decreased by 16%, moving 133,427 cars.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Meanwhile, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Mazatlán experienced a slight contraction of 0.5% in the accumulated January-March 2026 period</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to the same period in 2025, operating 40,642 units.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Regarding participation in March 2026, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Veracruz accounted for  </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">44% </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">of vehicles mobilized</span></strong><span dir="auto"> ; Lázaro Cárdenas had 28%, Altamira 21%, Mazatlán 5% and Tuxpan 2%.</span></p>
<p><iframe id="datawrapper-chart-w24mu" title="Part. Total (%) Car Movement (Mar-26)" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/w24mu/1/" width="600" height="392" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Circle chart" data-external="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-31="true" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Despite the drop in vehicle traffic at the country&#8217;s ports in March 2026, car production in Mexico showed improvement during the third month of the year.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">According to figures from the </span><a href="https://www.inegi.org.mx/"><span dir="auto">National Institute of Statistics and Geography (Inegi) , </span></a><strong><span dir="auto">343,520 light vehicles were manufactured</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in March 2026 , representing a 2.5 percent year-on-year increase. Additionally, 310,205 vehicles were exported, a 4.2 percent increase compared to the same month in 2025.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Meanwhile, </span><strong><span dir="auto">in the first quarter of 2026, 969,294 units were manufactured in </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">Mexican plants</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , a 0.5% increase compared to the same period last year. During the January-March period of this year, 795,631 units were exported, a 2.5% increase over the same period in 2025.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/vehicle-traffic-through-mexican-ports-decreases-in-march/">Vehicle traffic through Mexican ports decreases in March</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investigation underway into the origin of hydrocarbons surrounding a CMA CGM vessel in the port of Veracruz</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/investigation-underway-into-the-origin-of-hydrocarbons-surrounding-a-cma-cgm-vessel-in-the-port-of-veracruz/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 22:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asipona Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA CGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hutchison Ports Icave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAVE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIL SPILL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SECRETARIAT OF THE NAVY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=634999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The detection of hydrocarbons in the port of Veracruz , reported on April 4 by the Mexican Navy (Semar) , comes at a time when the traceability of contaminants in the Gulf of Mexico discovered since the beginning of March of this year has become unclear. Regarding the CMA CGM Moliere vessel —docked since March 27 at pier 14 of ICAVE —authorities confirmed [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/investigation-underway-into-the-origin-of-hydrocarbons-surrounding-a-cma-cgm-vessel-in-the-port-of-veracruz/">Investigation underway into the origin of hydrocarbons surrounding a CMA CGM vessel in the port of Veracruz</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/CMA-CGM-Moliere-Veracruz-annm.png" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The </span><strong><span dir="auto">detection of hydrocarbons in the port of Veracruz</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , reported on April 4 by the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Mexican Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , comes at a time when the traceability of contaminants in the Gulf of Mexico discovered since the beginning of March of this year has become unclear. Regarding the </span><strong><span dir="auto">CMA CGM Moliere</span></strong><span dir="auto"> vessel —docked since March 27 at pier 14 of </span><a href="https://hutchisonportsicave.com/es"><span dir="auto">ICAVE</span></a><span dir="auto"> —authorities confirmed the presence of residue, but not its origin, opening a front of uncertainty that transcends this specific incident and is part of a regional context marked by spills with no clear cause and ongoing operational repercussions.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">According to a statement issued by the Mexican Navy (Semar) on April 4, naval personnel conducted reconnaissance and cleanup operations after </span><strong><span dir="auto">detecting oil slicks and iridescent patterns on the water&#8217;s surface</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in the port of Veracruz. The hydrocarbons were contained within booms placed around the vessel—owned by the French company </span><a href="https://www.cma-cgm.com/"><span dir="auto">CMA CGM</span></a><span dir="auto"> —in an area of ​​approximately 20 by 30 meters, from which nearly 180 kilograms of contaminated material were collected.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">The document also provides a relevant temporal element: since the ship&#8217;s arrival on March 27, the </span><strong><span dir="auto">presence of these containment barriers</span></strong><span dir="auto"> had already been confirmed , suggesting that the event was neither immediate nor necessarily public from its origin.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Despite this, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the Navy avoids establishing a direct causal link</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . Instead of attributing the spill, it merely notes the presence of hydrocarbons &#8220;in the vicinity&#8221; of the vessel and confirms that no contamination was detected outside the contained area.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">More than a week after the ship&#8217;s arrival, and with the incident already under control and in its containment phase, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the source of the contaminant remains undetermined . In this context, a source close to the incident investigation told T21 that a </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">certified underwater inspection</span></strong><span dir="auto"> of the vessel will be carried out this Wednesday, April 8 , to verify whether or not there is a connection between the ship and the presence of the hydrocarbon.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In contrast to the statement issued by the Navy on April 4, the </span><a href="https://www.puertodeveracruz.com.mx/"><span dir="auto">Veracruz Port Authority (Asipona)</span></a><span dir="auto"> has not yet published an official statement on the incident through its institutional channels, despite it occurring within the port area under its administration. This is particularly relevant considering the operational importance of the Port of Veracruz, which in 2025 ranked third nationally in container handling, </span><strong><span dir="auto">with 1,299,337 TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) moved</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , surpassed only by Manzanillo and Lázaro Cárdenas, according to data from the port authority itself.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">For its part, </span><strong><span dir="auto">T21 sought out CMA CGM executives</span></strong><span dir="auto"> to learn their position after the events that occurred between March 27 and April 4; however, the shipping company declined to offer statements at this time.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">A navigation specialist who requested anonymity told T21 that the ship&#8217;s captain may have requested the </span><strong><span dir="auto">cleaning of the vessel&#8217;s hull</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in anticipation of a possible denial of entry to its next ports of call due to hydrocarbon pollution, such as the port of Houston, Texas.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">This situation has begun to affect port operations. The presence of the CMA CGM Moliere vessel at the ICAVE terminal, while the origin of the hydrocarbon is being clarified, </span><strong><span dir="auto">has already led to delays in the arrival and servicing of other vessels</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , which anticipates disruptions to the logistics chain for foreign trade users, particularly importers and exporters.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">In addition, the ICAVE terminal itself has been unable to unload a ship that arrived this week with </span><strong><span dir="auto">new equipment</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , including dock and yard cranes, which adds pressure to operations at a port that remains one of the main container hubs in the country.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">The impact comes in an already tense context. Since early March, an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico—whose origin has yet to be determined by federal authorities—has begun to affect regional maritime operations. Alerts from the logistics sector indicate that shipping companies such as </span><a href="https://la.one-line.com/es"><span dir="auto">Ocean Network Express (ONE)</span></a><span dir="auto"> have reported </span><strong><span dir="auto">navigation restrictions, vessel diversions, delays, and additional costs</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in ports like Veracruz and Altamira.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">While there is no confirmation that </span><strong><span dir="auto">the two events are linked</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , the temporal coincidence between an active regional spill and a local incident with no defined traceability introduces an additional factor of pressure on port operations.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Thus, what began as an event contained in a delimited area evolves into a broader scenario: hydrocarbons whose origin has not been determined, operations that begin to feel its effects, and </span><strong><span dir="auto">a logistics chain that, faced with uncertainty, begins to adjust times and costs</span></strong><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/enrique-duarte-rionda-a0714647/"><span dir="auto">@Enrique Duarte Rionda</span></a><span dir="auto">  /  </span><a id="menurj3" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-ny-medios/" href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Link @GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/investigation-underway-into-the-origin-of-hydrocarbons-surrounding-a-cma-cgm-vessel-in-the-port-of-veracruz/">Investigation underway into the origin of hydrocarbons surrounding a CMA CGM vessel in the port of Veracruz</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asipona Manzanillo activates protocols after alert of breach at PIS</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/asipona-manzanillo-activates-protocols-after-alert-of-breach-at-pis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 22:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asipona Manzanillo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HACKING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PORT OF MAZANILLO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ports of Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SECRETRIAT OF THE NAVY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SECURE SMART PORT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=634985</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The alert didn&#8217;t come from an official channel, but from a social media post. And yet, it was enough to trigger a reaction at one of the most sensitive nodes in the Mexican port system . The Manzanillo Port Authority (Asipona) confirmed in a statement that on April 5th it detected a post on social media warning of a potential [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/asipona-manzanillo-activates-protocols-after-alert-of-breach-at-pis/">Asipona Manzanillo activates protocols after alert of breach at PIS</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Asipona-Manzanillo-acceso-edr.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The alert didn&#8217;t come from an official channel, but from a social media post. And yet, it was enough to trigger a reaction at one of the most sensitive nodes in the </span><strong><span dir="auto">Mexican port system</span></strong><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The </span><a href="https://www.puertomanzanillo.com.mx/espi/0000001/inicio.php"><span dir="auto">Manzanillo Port Authority (Asipona)</span></a><span dir="auto"> confirmed in a statement that on April 5th it detected a post on social media warning of a </span><strong><span dir="auto">potential data breach on the Smart Port for Safety (PIS) platform</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , the system that coordinates much of the logistics operations at the country&#8217;s ports. Following this, security protocols were activated, resulting in temporary disruptions to system access. According to the agency, access has now been restored and the system is operating normally.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The episode, however, is not insignificant. And even less so given the context in which it arises.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">So far, Asipona Manzanillo has been the only one of the 18 port authorities coordinated by the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Mexican Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> to issue a public statement regarding this alleged incident, </span><strong><span dir="auto">despite the fact that PIS has a national scope</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . This silence from the other port authorities creates uncertainty in a platform designed precisely to standardize and centralize operations.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">In fact, since the evening of April 5, PIS users nationwide reported receiving an official email requesting them to </span><strong><span dir="auto">change their passwords</span></strong><span dir="auto"> for using this digital platform.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">The initial alert was issued by journalist Ignacio Villaseñor, who on April 5th published information in X about an alleged hack of the system. In his message, the journalist stated that </span><strong><span dir="auto">a cybercriminal identified as “marssepe”, allegedly linked to the group SOCIEDAD PRIVADA 157</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , had released a 39.7 gigabyte file containing records extracted from PIS.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">According to the publication, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the information contains sensitive data on more than 640,000 port operators</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , including full name, CURP (Mexican national ID number), RFC (Mexican tax ID number), social security number, blood type, facial photograph, as well as company, position, and port of operation. Villaseñor warns that the exposure of this registry—which is mandatory for operating in port facilities—could escalate from a digital risk to a physical security threat, enabling practices such as identity theft, extortion, or coercion within the logistics chain.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">So far, </span><strong><span dir="auto">no federal authority</span></strong><span dir="auto"> has confirmed the veracity of said leak in the terms presented on social media.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">What is certain is that </span><strong><span dir="auto">Asipona Manzanillo&#8217;s response focused on preventative measures</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . The agency reported that, after detecting the leak, it restricted access to services hosted on its servers, updated user credentials, disabled direct access to databases from external IP addresses, and canceled access in test environments. It also implemented additional tools to prevent unauthorized API requests and strengthened the monitoring of system traffic and URLs.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Beyond the technical aspects, the incident highlights the importance of PIS as critical infrastructure. </span><strong><span dir="auto">This system was created in 2021 at Asipona Manzanillo itself</span></strong><span dir="auto"> with the intention of operating as a one-stop maritime-port window, capable of centralizing, standardizing, and providing traceability to operational, administrative, and revenue collection processes in ports.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">According to its logic, all logistics actors—from carriers to customs brokers and operators—must register on the platform to operate, making PIS a repository of highly sensitive information. Currently, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the system has 32 modules</span></strong><span dir="auto"> developed and implemented nationwide.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">That level of centralization, which under normal conditions represents efficiency and control, also amplifies the risks when the </span><strong><span dir="auto">possibility of a breach</span></strong><span dir="auto"> arises .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The statement from Asipona Manzanillo insists that the system is operating normally and that constant monitoring is being maintained to prevent incidents. However, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the lack of a coordinated national approach</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in a system that is by definition cross-cutting raises a fundamental question: if the risk is shared, why isn&#8217;t the response?</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In an industry where digitalization has become the backbone of operations, cybersecurity management is no longer just a technical issue, but a matter of systemic trust. And in this arena, </span><strong><span dir="auto">silence speaks volumes</span></strong><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/enrique-duarte-rionda-a0714647/"><span dir="auto">@Enrique Duarte Rionda</span></a><span dir="auto">  /  </span><a id="menurj3" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-ny-medios/" href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Link @GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/asipona-manzanillo-activates-protocols-after-alert-of-breach-at-pis/">Asipona Manzanillo activates protocols after alert of breach at PIS</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vehicle traffic through Mexican ports falls in February</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/vehicle-traffic-through-mexican-ports-falls-in-february/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 21:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Altamira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Lázaro Cárdenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PORT OF MANZATLÁN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PORT OF TUXPAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VEHICLE MOBILIZATION]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=634755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In February 2026, the movement of vehicles through the main Mexican ports registered a drop of 20.9% compared to the same month in 2025, with a total of 119,711 units, according to figures from the National Port System of the Secretariat of the Navy (Semar) . An analysis by T21 Business Intelligence showed that 9,218 units were moved through the port of Mazatlán, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/vehicle-traffic-through-mexican-ports-falls-in-february/">Vehicle traffic through Mexican ports falls in February</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Autos1.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In February 2026, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the movement of vehicles through the main Mexican ports </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">registered a drop of 20.9%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to the same month in 2025, with a total of 119,711 units, according to figures from the National Port System of the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Secretariat of the Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">An analysis by </span><a href="https://t21.com.mx/"><span dir="auto">T21 Business Intelligence</span></a><span dir="auto"> showed that </span><strong><span dir="auto">9,218 units were moved through the port of Mazatlán, Sinaloa, in the second month of the year</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , 39.4% less than in the same period of 2025. Meanwhile, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas, Michoacán, experienced a decline in vehicle traffic in February 2026, with 36,955 units</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , representing a decrease of 23.3% compared to the same month last year.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">The port of Tuxpan, in Veracruz, handled 2,833 units</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , 22.2% fewer than in February 2025. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira, Tamaulipas, registered a 17.4% drop in vehicles handled</span></strong><span dir="auto"> during the second month of 2026, with 28,176 units. </span><strong><span dir="auto">The port of Veracruz reported a 15.2% year-over-year decrease</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , totaling 42,529 units handled during the period.</span></p>
<p><iframe id="datawrapper-chart-8q8NV" title="Monthly car movement Jan-Feb 2026" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/8q8NV/1/" width="600" height="402" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Small multiple column chart" data-external="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-31="true" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">The cumulative total for January-February 2026 showed a decline of 4.4%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to the same period in 2025, with an operation of 256,936 vehicles.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">During the period, two ports reported growth. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Mazatlán showed a 30.7% increase</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to the same period in 2015, with 31,864 vehicles handled. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Veracruz, for its part, saw a 13.8% increase in the first two months of the year</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , totaling 89,413 units operated.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In contrast, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Tuxpan saw a 48.8% drop</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in the cumulative total for 2026 compared to the same period in 2025, with 2,833 units transported. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas declined by 20.1%, totaling </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">81,514 units operated</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in the first two months of 2026. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira experienced an 11.8% year-on-year contraction</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , registering 51,312 units.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Regarding the participation by port in February 2026, Veracruz concentrated the largest number of vehicles moved with 36%, followed by Lázaro Cárdenas with 31%, Altamira with 24%, Mazatlán with 8% and Tuxpan with 2 percent.</span></p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" id="datawrapper-chart-7OaXh" title="Part. Total (%) Vehicle Movement (Feb-26)" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/7OaXh/1/" width="600" height="392" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Circle chart" data-external="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-31="true" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p>
<p><strong><span class="s1"><span dir="auto">In February 2026, </span></span><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">311,457 units were produced </span></span></strong><span class="s1"><strong><span dir="auto">in the country</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , 1.80% less than in the same period last year. In the </span><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">January-February period of this year</span></span><span dir="auto"> , automotive plants located in Mexico manufactured  </span><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">625,774 light vehicles</span></span><span dir="auto"> , representing a  </span><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">negative variation of 0.58% </span></span><span dir="auto"> compared to the same period in 2025.</span></span></p>
<p><span class="s1"><span dir="auto">Meanwhile, during the first two months of 2026, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Mexico exported </span></strong></span><strong><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">485,426 light vehicles</span></span></strong><span class="s1"><span dir="auto"> , a figure that implied a  </span></span><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">growth of 1.36% </span></span><span class="s1"><span dir="auto">compared to the same period in 2025, despite the annual drop of 4.45% that exports registered in February, with </span><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">247,945 vehicles, according</span></span></span><span dir="auto"> to the </span><a href="https://www.inegi.org.mx/"><span dir="auto">National Institute of Statistics and Geography (Inegi)</span></a><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/vehicle-traffic-through-mexican-ports-falls-in-february/">Vehicle traffic through Mexican ports falls in February</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Urreta returns to lead Cameintram</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/urreta-returns-to-lead-cameintram/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 23:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameintram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTEROCEANIC CORRIDOR OF THE TEHUANTEPEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JOSÉ MANUEL URRETA ORTEGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MARITIME FREIGHT TRANSPORT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEXICAN CHAMBER OF THE MARITME TRANSPORT INDUSTRY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OFFSHORE INDSUTRY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEMEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SECRETARIAT OF THE NAVY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=634718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Mexican Chamber of the Maritime Transport Industry (Cameintram) ratified José Manuel Urreta Ortega as its president for the 2026 term , during the organization&#8217;s annual assembly held at the Confederation of Industrial Chambers (Concamin) , in an event where Admiral Gerardo de Jesús Toledo Guzmán, Undersecretary of Maritime and Port Affairs of the Secretariat of the Navy , swore in the National [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/urreta-returns-to-lead-cameintram/">Urreta returns to lead Cameintram</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cameintram-Consejo-2026-cmntrm.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The </span><a href="https://cameintram.org/"><span dir="auto">Mexican Chamber of the Maritime Transport Industry (Cameintram)</span></a><span dir="auto"> ratified </span><strong><span dir="auto">José Manuel Urreta Ortega as its president for the 2026 term</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , during the organization&#8217;s annual assembly held at the </span><a href="https://concamin.org.mx/"><span dir="auto">Confederation of Industrial Chambers (Concamin)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , in an event where Admiral Gerardo de Jesús Toledo Guzmán, Undersecretary of Maritime and Port Affairs of the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Secretariat of the Navy</span></a><span dir="auto"> , swore in the National Board of Directors.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Upon assuming his second year at the helm of the agency, Urreta Ortega expressed his gratitude for the trust placed in him by the country&#8217;s shipowners and their counterparts in the Mexican government and legislature, while outlining the key areas of focus for this new phase. “We have promoted efforts to </span><strong><span dir="auto">incentivize shipbuilding and coastal shipping in Mexico</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , and we aim to maintain active collaboration in the development of policies to foster and develop the national merchant marine, in order to defend and promote greater participation by shipowners, service providers, and related maritime transport activities in Mexico,” he stated.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_670871" class="wp-caption aligncenter" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-670871"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-670871 size-full" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cameintram-Urreta-2026-cmntrm.jpeg" sizes="(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cameintram-Urreta-2026-cmntrm.jpeg 1280w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cameintram-Urreta-2026-cmntrm-300x223.jpeg 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cameintram-Urreta-2026-cmntrm-1024x762.jpeg 1024w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cameintram-Urreta-2026-cmntrm-768x572.jpeg 768w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cameintram-Urreta-2026-cmntrm-600x447.jpeg 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cameintram-Urreta-2026-cmntrm-150x112.jpeg 150w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cameintram-Urreta-2026-cmntrm-750x558.jpeg 750w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Cameintram-Urreta-2026-cmntrm-1140x849.jpeg 1140w" alt="" width="1280" height="953" data-pin-no-hover="true" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-670871" class="wp-caption-text"><span dir="auto">Photo: José Manuel Urreta Ortega</span></figcaption></figure>
<p><span dir="auto">In his message, he stressed that </span><strong><span dir="auto">port modernization</span></strong><span dir="auto"> will be a key factor for the sector&#8217;s growth, noting that &#8220;the progress of infrastructure projects will allow us to absorb the projected increases in maritime operations in the coming years.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">As part of its 2025 review, the organization reported progress in strengthening its institutional relationship with the Mexican Navy, the Port Captaincies and Maritime Affairs Unit, the </span><a href="https://www.anam.gob.mx/"><span dir="auto">National Customs Agency of Mexico (ANAM)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , as well as with the authorities of the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/ciit"><span dir="auto">Interoceanic Corridor of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (CIIT)</span></a><span dir="auto"> and the Navy Commission in the </span><a href="https://web.diputados.gob.mx/inicio"><span dir="auto">Chamber of Deputies</span></a><span dir="auto"> . It also promoted new short <strong><em>sea</em></strong></span><strong><span dir="auto"> shipping routes in coordination with the Port of Miami, in addition to holding working sessions with Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex )</span></strong><span dir="auto"> to address issues related to payments to suppliers.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">In international matters, Cameintram maintained collaboration with the </span><a href="https://www.imo.org/es"><span dir="auto">International Maritime Organization</span></a><span dir="auto"> on issues related to the decarbonization of the sector.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">By 2026, the organization plans to continue its institutional collaboration with the federal government, particularly with the Secretariat of the Navy, as well as strengthen its relationship with Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex). Among its strategic projects, the </span><strong><span dir="auto">Florida Project stands out, focused on developing </span></strong><em><span dir="auto">short sea shipping</span></em><span dir="auto"> routes between ports in the Gulf of Mexico and the state of Florida</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The business leader pointed out that the sector&#8217;s main challenges are linked to the relocation of production chains, which demands greater efficiency in ports and fleets, as well as improvements in safety and connectivity in coastal shipping operations to reduce costs and transit times. In this context, he emphasized the opportunities presented by the Interoceanic Corridor of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec and the sector&#8217;s participation in the </span><strong><span dir="auto">renegotiations of the North American trade agreement.</span></strong></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Regarding cabotage, the aim is to increase the activity of affiliated companies in segments such as oil, </span><em><span dir="auto">offshore</span></em><span dir="auto"> , mineral bulk, agricultural bulk and general cargo, in addition to </span><strong><span dir="auto">strengthening coordination with authorities</span></strong><span dir="auto"> on regulatory issues, navigation permits and certifications.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Cameintram also promotes the </span><strong><span dir="auto">development of shipyards in the country</span></strong><span dir="auto"> to strengthen shipbuilding and the national merchant fleet, which, according to the organization, would contribute to job creation and increased revenue, although this requires conditions such as legal certainty, financing schemes and customs facilitation.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">In parallel, the sector faces the challenge of complying with international regulations for the </span><strong><span dir="auto">reduction of polluting emissions,</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in line with the International Maritime Organization, as well as advancing in the adoption of digital tools and artificial intelligence for route optimization, vessel monitoring and supply chain management.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">At the close of his remarks, Urreta Ortega emphasized the importance of maritime transport for the country&#8217;s foreign trade: &#8220;In this second year of work, </span><strong><span dir="auto">we will sail together towards a more competitive, sustainable, and proudly Mexican maritime transport industry.&#8221;</span></strong></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a id="menurj3" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-ny-medios/" href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Link @GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/urreta-returns-to-lead-cameintram/">Urreta returns to lead Cameintram</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ports in Mexico at “low tide”: TEU movements decline during February</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/ports-in-mexico-at-low-tide-teu-movements-decline-during-february/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 23:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONTENINER MOVEMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guaymas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lázaro Cárdenas Port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MANZANILLO PORT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATIONAL PORT SYSTEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Altamira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VERACRUZ PORT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=634705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mexican ports reported declines during the second month of 2026, moving 720,421 twenty-foot containers (TEUs) , which meant a decrease of 4.9% compared to February 2025, according to figures from the National Port System of the Secretariat of the Navy (Semar) . An analysis by  T21 Business Intelligence showed that the vast majority of ports lost TEU movements in February, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/ports-in-mexico-at-low-tide-teu-movements-decline-during-february/">Ports in Mexico at “low tide”: TEU movements decline during February</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Puerto-de-Manzanillo-asipona.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Mexican ports reported declines during the second month of 2026, moving 720,421 twenty-foot containers (TEUs)</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , which meant a decrease of 4.9% compared to February 2025, according to figures from the National Port System of the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Secretariat of the Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">An analysis by  </span><a href="https://t21.com.mx/"><span dir="auto">T21 Business Intelligence</span></a><span dir="auto"> showed that the vast majority of ports lost TEU movements in February, with the exception of </span><strong><span dir="auto">Guaymas (Sonora), which grew by double digits by reporting 61.6%, with 1,317 TEUs moved</span></strong><span dir="auto"> ; and Coatzacoalcos (Veracruz), which reported a growth of 5.6% with 1,136 TEUs.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In contrast,  </span><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo, in Colima</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , accounted for a total of  </span><strong><span dir="auto">310,950 TEUs, a slight decrease of 0.6%</span></strong><span dir="auto">  compared to the same period in 2025; while </span><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas, in Michoacán, totaled 203,300 TEUs handled</span></strong><span dir="auto">  during February, 4% less than in the same period of 2025.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Meanwhile, the port of  </span><strong><span dir="auto">Veracruz handled 89,692 TEUs in the second month of the year</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , a 5.5% drop compared to 2025; and </span><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira, in Tamaulipas, which has had three months of negative figures</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , registered a contraction of 15.6% compared to the same period in 2025, reporting </span><strong><span dir="auto">58,395 TEUs handled</span></strong><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" id="datawrapper-chart-U791d" title="TEU movements January-February 2026" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/U791d/1/" width="600" height="450" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Split bars" data-external="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-40="true" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Despite the negative numbers reported in several ports, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the accumulated total for the first two months of 2025 showed an increase of 1.8% compared to the January-February period of 2025</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , with </span><strong><span dir="auto">1,518,327 TEUs</span></strong><span dir="auto"> handled . </span><strong><span dir="auto">Guaymas, Sonora, saw double-digit growth of 78.4%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , registering 2,903 TEUs; and Lázaro Cárdenas, which increased by 8.3% to 438,403 TEUs, registered the most significant growth.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Regarding participation in the second month of 2026,  </span><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo accounted for 43.2% of the total TEU movement</span></strong><span dir="auto"> ; Lázaro Cárdenas had 28.2%, Veracruz 12.4% and Altamira 8.1 percent.</span></p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" id="datawrapper-chart-xrYyc" title="Part. Total (%) Container Movement (Feb-25)" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/xrYyc/1/" width="600" height="591" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Circle chart" data-external="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-40="true" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In February 2026, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the Mexican economy showed a slowdown, with an annual growth of 1.22% in the Timely Indicator of Economic Activity</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , according to figures from the </span><a href="https://www.inegi.org.mx/"><span dir="auto">National Institute of Statistics and Geography (Inegi)</span></a><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The industrial sector contracted by 1.89% compared to the same month in 2025, while services declined by 1.87%. </span><strong><span dir="auto">The combination of the contraction in secondary activities</span></strong><span dir="auto"> and the slower growth in tertiary activities reflected weaker economic activity during the second month of the year, which was reflected in TEU shipments.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/ports-in-mexico-at-low-tide-teu-movements-decline-during-february/">Ports in Mexico at “low tide”: TEU movements decline during February</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican ports start 2026 with an increase in TEU movement</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/mexican-ports-start-2026-with-an-increase-in-teu-movement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 18:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONTAINER MOVEMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Containerized cargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lázaro Cárdenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manzanillo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Mazatlán]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEU]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=634025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mexico&#8217;s ports started 2026 on the &#8220;right foot&#8221;, moving 797,906 twenty-foot containers (TEUs) , which meant an 8.8% increase compared to January 2025, according to figures from the Secretariat of the Navy (Semar) . An analysis by  T21 Business Intelligence showed that Lázaro Cárdenas, in Michoacán, handled 235,103 TEUs during the first month of this year, 21.8% more than in January 2026, while [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/mexican-ports-start-2026-with-an-increase-in-teu-movement/">Mexican ports start 2026 with an increase in TEU movement</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Puerto-de-Manzanillo-2-asipona.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Mexico&#8217;s ports </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">started 2026 on the &#8220;right foot&#8221;, moving 797,906 twenty-foot containers (TEUs)</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , which meant an 8.8% increase compared to January 2025, according to figures from the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Secretariat of the Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">An analysis by  </span><a href="https://t21.com.mx/"><span dir="auto">T21 Business Intelligence</span></a><span dir="auto"> showed that </span><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas, in Michoacán, handled 235,103 TEUs</span></strong><span dir="auto"> during the first month of this year, 21.8% more than in January 2026, while the port of </span><strong><span dir="auto">Veracruz moved 93,032 TEUs</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , representing an increase of 13.8% in the period.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo, in Colima</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , was the port that registered the most container movement at the beginning of 2026, with a total of </span><strong><span dir="auto">354,534 TEUs, an increase of 7.8%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to the same cycle of 2025.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In contrast, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira, in Tamaulipas, continued its downward trend</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . In January 2026, it handled 63,374 TEUs, representing a 9.3% drop compared to January 2025, marking two consecutive months of decline.</span></p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" id="datawrapper-chart-fpUpT" title="Monthly container movement Jan 2026 (TEU)" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/fpUpT/1/" width="600" height="490" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Bar chart" data-external="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-33="true" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe><br />
<span dir="auto">Smaller ports also saw significant variations in January 2026 compared to the same month in 2025. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Guaymas, in Sonora, reported a 95.3% increase</span></strong><span dir="auto"> with 1,586 TEUs handled during the period. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Mazatlán, in Sinaloa, experienced a 35.1% decrease</span></strong><span dir="auto"> with 2,284 TEUs handled.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Regarding participation in the first month of 2026, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo accounted for 44.43% of the total movement of 20-foot containers</span></strong><span dir="auto"> ; Lázaro Cárdenas had 29.46%, Veracruz 11.66%, and Altamira 7.94 percent.</span></p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" id="datawrapper-chart-rV0r8" title="Part. Total (%) Container Movement (Jan-25)" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/rV0r8/1/" width="600" height="504" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Circle chart" data-external="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-33="true" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Faced with less than encouraging growth forecasts, Mexico&#8217;s main ports are emerging as key points to sustain the country&#8217;s competitiveness.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In that context, 2026 presents a mixed economic outlook for Mexico: while the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/shcp"><span dir="auto">Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (SHCP)</span></a><span dir="auto"> projected a growth of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of between 1.8% and 2.8%, the </span><a href="https://www.oecd.org/en.html"><span dir="auto">Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)</span></a><span dir="auto"> forecasts an expansion of 1.4% for the Mexican economy.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a id="menurj3" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-ny-medios/" href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Link @GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/mexican-ports-start-2026-with-an-increase-in-teu-movement/">Mexican ports start 2026 with an increase in TEU movement</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vehicle traffic through Mexican ports increases in December; cumulative total declines</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/vehicle-traffic-through-mexican-ports-increases-in-december-cumulative-total-declines/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 19:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUTOMORIVE INDUSTRY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GROWTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lázaro Cárdenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mazatlán]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOBILIZATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VEHICLES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veracruz]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=633181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In December 2025, the movement of vehicles through Mexico&#8217;s main ports registered a growth of 43.9% compared to the same month in 2024, with a total of 228,210 new units , according to data from the Secretariat of the Navy (Semar) . However, in the accumulated January-December 2025, a slight decrease of 1.3% was observed compared to the same period in 2024, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/vehicle-traffic-through-mexican-ports-increases-in-december-cumulative-total-declines/">Vehicle traffic through Mexican ports increases in December; cumulative total declines</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/autos_ptos_lc_1ok.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In December 2025, the movement of vehicles through Mexico&#8217;s main ports registered </span><strong><span dir="auto">a growth of 43.9% compared to the same month in 2024, with a total of </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">228,210 new units</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , according to data from the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Secretariat of the Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">However, </span><strong><span dir="auto">in the accumulated January-December 2025, a slight decrease of 1.3% was observed</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to the same period in 2024, with the operation of two million 262 thousand 289 vehicles.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_666020" class="wp-caption alignnone" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-666020"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-666020 size-full" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PAGD1.jpg" sizes="(max-width: 1170px) 100vw, 1170px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PAGD1.jpg 1170w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PAGD1-300x179.jpg 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PAGD1-1024x613.jpg 1024w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PAGD1-768x459.jpg 768w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PAGD1-600x359.jpg 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PAGD1-150x90.jpg 150w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PAGD1-750x449.jpg 750w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PAGD1-1140x682.jpg 1140w" alt="" width="1170" height="700" data-pin-no-hover="true" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-666020" class="wp-caption-text"><span dir="auto">Source: T21 Business Intelligence with information from Semar.</span></figcaption></figure>
<p><span dir="auto">An analysis conducted by </span><a href="https://t21.com.mx/"><span dir="auto">T21 Business Intelligence</span></a><span dir="auto"> identified that <strong>104,119 units </strong></span><strong><span dir="auto">were moved through the port of Lázaro Cárdenas, Michoacán,</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in the last month of last year , 161.4% more than in the same period of 2024. In the accumulated total for 2025, 804,221 vehicles were handled, representing a growth of 19.1% compared to 2024.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Mazatlán, Sinaloa, handled 23,799 units in December 2025</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , representing a 162.4% increase compared to the same month in 2024. As for the year-to-date figures, this Mexican Pacific port grew by 4.7% last year, with 172,359 units.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Tuxpan, Veracruz, showed mixed results</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . </span><strong><span dir="auto">In December 2025, it reached 1,979 units, 73.6% more than in the same month of 2024.</span></strong><span dir="auto"> However, in the accumulated total for 2025, it registered 38,321 vehicles moved, a drop of 54.9% compared to 2024.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_666019" class="wp-caption aligncenter" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-666019"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-666019 size-full" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PGDD2.jpg" sizes="(max-width: 1170px) 100vw, 1170px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PGDD2.jpg 1170w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PGDD2-300x179.jpg 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PGDD2-1024x613.jpg 1024w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PGDD2-768x459.jpg 768w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PGDD2-600x359.jpg 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PGDD2-150x90.jpg 150w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PGDD2-750x449.jpg 750w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/PGDD2-1140x682.jpg 1140w" alt="" width="1170" height="700" data-pin-no-hover="true" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-666019" class="wp-caption-text"><span dir="auto">Source: T21 Business Intelligence with information from Semar.</span></figcaption></figure>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">The port of Veracruz showed stagnation in December of last year, handling </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">60,231 units</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , a figure that remained practically unchanged compared to the same month in 2024. In the cumulative total for 2025, 770,151 new vehicles were handled through this Gulf of Mexico port, a drop of 9.5% compared to the same period in 2024.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira, Tamaulipas, registered declines at the close of 2025. Last December, it mobilized 38,082 units</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , a decrease of 21.2% compared to the same month of 2024. From January to December 2025, it totaled 475,437 units, which represented a decline of 7.7% compared to the same period in 2024.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Regarding the participation by port in December 2025, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas concentrated the largest number of vehicles moved with 45.6%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , followed by Veracruz with 26.4%, Altamira with 16.7%, Mazatlán with 10.4% and Tuxpan with 0.9 percent.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_666023" class="wp-caption alignnone" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-666023"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-666023 size-full" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/G3.jpg" sizes="(max-width: 1170px) 100vw, 1170px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/G3.jpg 1170w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/G3-300x179.jpg 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/G3-1024x613.jpg 1024w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/G3-768x459.jpg 768w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/G3-600x359.jpg 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/G3-150x90.jpg 150w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/G3-750x449.jpg 750w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/G3-1140x682.jpg 1140w" alt="" width="1170" height="700" data-pin-no-hover="true" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-666023" class="wp-caption-text"><span dir="auto">Source: T21 Business Intelligence with information from Semar</span></figcaption></figure>
<p><span dir="auto">According to figures from the </span><a href="https://www.inegi.org.mx/"><span dir="auto">National Institute of Statistics and Geography (Inegi)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , <strong>243,961 units </strong></span><strong><span dir="auto">were manufactured in Mexico in December 2025</span></strong> <span dir="auto"> , an increase of 8.5% compared to the same month in 2024. However, the cumulative total for last year was <strong>3,953,494 units</strong> , representing a decrease of 0.9% compared to the same period in 2024.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">December&#8217;s figures reveal a mixed picture for the end of 2025 across the ports: growth in some and decline in others. The recovery of vehicle traffic is shaping up to be a gradual process, contingent on the state of the </span><strong><span dir="auto">automotive industry</span></strong><span dir="auto"> throughout 2026, after it was one of the sectors most affected by US tariffs, and on the ports&#8217; ability to adapt to a more demanding trade environment.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on X:  </span><a href="https://twitter.com/GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/vehicle-traffic-through-mexican-ports-increases-in-december-cumulative-total-declines/">Vehicle traffic through Mexican ports increases in December; cumulative total declines</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican ports, with “good tides” in TEU operations during 2025</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/mexican-ports-with-good-tides-in-teu-operations-during-2025/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 21:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Altamira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONTAINER MOBILIZATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DECEMBER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lázaro Cárdenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MANZANILLO PORT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VERACRUZ PORT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=633135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Despite the uncertainty that global trade has faced due to more aggressive tariff policies, Mexico&#8217;s ports ended 2025 with a record of 9,529,886 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) handled, representing a 1.6% increase compared to 2024 , when 9,375,546 TEUs were moved, according to figures from the Secretariat of the Navy (Semar) . In December 2025 alone , there was a slight [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/mexican-ports-with-good-tides-in-teu-operations-during-2025/">Mexican ports, with “good tides” in TEU operations during 2025</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Puertodic.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Despite the uncertainty that global trade has faced due to more aggressive tariff policies, Mexico&#8217;s ports ended 2025 with a record of </span><strong><span dir="auto">9,529,886 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) handled, representing a 1.6% increase </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">compared to 2024</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , when 9,375,546 TEUs were moved, according to figures from the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Secretariat of the Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In December 2025 alone </span><strong><span dir="auto">, there was a slight increase of 0.9% compared to the same month in 2024</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , with a total of 804,452 TEUs handled.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_665889" class="wp-caption aligncenter" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-665889"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-665889 size-full" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD2.jpg" sizes="(max-width: 1170px) 100vw, 1170px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD2.jpg 1170w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD2-300x179.jpg 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD2-1024x613.jpg 1024w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD2-768x459.jpg 768w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD2-600x359.jpg 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD2-150x90.jpg 150w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD2-750x449.jpg 750w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD2-1140x682.jpg 1140w" alt="" width="1170" height="700" data-pin-no-hover="true" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-665889" class="wp-caption-text"><span dir="auto">Source: T21 Business Intelligence with information from Semar.</span></figcaption></figure>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo, in Colima, remained the leading port at the close of 2025, with a total of 346,003 TEUs in December</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , which meant an increase of 3.5% compared to the same period in 2024.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">However, the accumulated total for January-December of last year showed a slight drop, with </span><strong><span dir="auto">3,893,355 TEUs handled, a decrease of 0.8% compared to the accumulated total for 2024</span></strong><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Meanwhile, Lázaro Cárdenas, in Michoacán, totaled 229,012 TEUs moved during December 2025, a growth of 9.2%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> over the last month of 2024; while in the accumulated total it reached two million 616 thousand 770 TEUs, an increase of 8.7 percent.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">The port of Veracruz reported the operation of 101,532 TEUs in the last month of 2025, which meant a slight decrease of 0.1%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , and in the January-December period it totaled 1,299,337 TEUs, a decrease of 0.2% compared to the same period in 2024.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira, in Tamaulipas, also registered negative figures. In December 2025, it handled 66,838 TEUs, a drop of 20.7%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> ; while in the year to date, it moved 887,101 TEUs, a decrease of 3.5% compared to 2024.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Regarding the percentage of containers moved during December, Manzanillo accounted for 43%; Lázaro Cárdenas 28.4%, Veracruz 12.6%, and Altamira 8.3% of the total operations.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_665890" class="wp-caption aligncenter" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-665890"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-665890 size-full" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD1.jpg" sizes="(max-width: 1170px) 100vw, 1170px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD1.jpg 1170w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD1-300x179.jpg 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD1-1024x613.jpg 1024w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD1-768x459.jpg 768w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD1-600x359.jpg 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD1-150x90.jpg 150w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD1-750x449.jpg 750w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/GRCD1-1140x682.jpg 1140w" alt="" width="1170" height="700" data-pin-no-hover="true" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-665890" class="wp-caption-text"><span dir="auto">Source: T21 Business Intelligence with information from Semar.</span></figcaption></figure>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">The performance of Mexico&#8217;s main ports during 2025 reflected a landscape of resilience and adaptation in the face of international trade instability</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . Although some ports, such as Altamira, experienced declines, the sustained growth in Lázaro Cárdenas and the partial recovery of Manzanillo demonstrate that the National Port System maintains its responsiveness and remains a key driver of Mexico&#8217;s competitiveness.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on X:  </span><a href="https://twitter.com/GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/mexican-ports-with-good-tides-in-teu-operations-during-2025/">Mexican ports, with “good tides” in TEU operations during 2025</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
