<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Port of Veracruz archivos - T21</title>
	<atom:link href="https://t21.us/tag/port-of-veracruz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://t21.us/tag/port-of-veracruz/</link>
	<description>The leading provider of news in the Transportation and Logistics Sector, including Air, Maritime, Land, and Railway, in Mexico and Latin America.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:48:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Grupo CICE reaches 35 years with a commitment to expanding its role in foreign trade logistics</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/grupo-cice-reaches-35-years-with-a-commitment-to-expanding-its-role-in-foreign-trade-logistics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CICE GROUP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MARITIME FREIGHT TRANSPORT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=637423</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Grupo CICE celebrates its 35th anniversary at a time when the company is seeking to consolidate its position beyond its origins as a port operator. The celebration coincides with a period of infrastructure expansion, integration of logistics services, and new investments that reflect a strategy aimed at strengthening its participation in the supply chains connecting Mexico with international [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/grupo-cice-reaches-35-years-with-a-commitment-to-expanding-its-role-in-foreign-trade-logistics/">Grupo CICE reaches 35 years with a commitment to expanding its role in foreign trade logistics</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Grupo-CICE-terminal-de-Veracruz-cice.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="https://home.grupocice.com/"><span dir="auto">Grupo CICE</span></a><span dir="auto"> celebrates its 35th anniversary at a time when the company is seeking to consolidate its position beyond its origins as a port operator. The celebration coincides with a period of </span><strong><span dir="auto">infrastructure expansion, integration of logistics services, and new investments</span></strong><span dir="auto"> that reflect a strategy aimed at strengthening its participation in the supply chains connecting Mexico with international markets.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Since </span><strong><span dir="auto">beginning operations on August 1, 1991</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , as the first Mexican-owned port operator, the company has evolved into a model that integrates port, logistics, and land transportation services. According to the company, this transformation has responded to the evolving needs of national and international trade and the growing demand for comprehensive solutions that support the movement of goods.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">Grupo CICE&#8217;s evolution is also reflected in its most recent investments. The company recently inaugurated its </span><strong><span dir="auto">Semi-Specialized Container and Project Cargo Terminal in the North Bay of the Port of Veracruz</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , an infrastructure that expands the operational capacity of the country&#8217;s main commercial port and which it subsequently reinforced with a new phase of expansion focused on increasing storage capacity and handling of specialized cargo.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">This growth was complemented by obtaining the </span><strong><span dir="auto">Made in Mexico Distinction</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , awarded by the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/se"><span dir="auto">Ministry of Economy</span></a><span dir="auto"> , for its logistics services, a recognition that supports the development of national capabilities in a strategic sector for foreign trade and that strengthens the company&#8217;s position within the logistics market.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">For Leoncio Pérez López, CEO of Grupo CICE, the company&#8217;s evolution is based on a philosophy that has accompanied its development since its creation.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“Having been created to provide service, CICE has continually sought more and better ways to contribute to the </span><strong><span dir="auto">development of foreign trade and Mexican industry</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . It has been the driving force behind our development and the horizon of our vision. Being the Most Complete Option is not a slogan, it is a commitment,” he stated.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">The company states that this vision has allowed it </span><strong><span dir="auto">to strengthen capabilities, expand its presence, and develop comprehensive solutions</span></strong><span dir="auto"> supported by the experience of its staff, innovation, and continuous improvement—factors it considers fundamental to responding to an increasingly demanding and competitive logistics environment.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">With this anniversary, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Grupo CICE also reaffirms its commitment to continue investing</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in innovation, sustainability, and the integration of logistics solutions to address the evolving dynamics of global trade. Under this strategy, the company seeks to consolidate a platform capable of connecting port services, transportation, and logistics with a long-term vision, at a time when supply chain efficiency has become a key differentiator for the competitiveness of Mexican foreign trade.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Currently, Grupo CICE supports its operations with a workforce of over </span><strong><span dir="auto">2,500 employees</span></strong><span dir="auto"> and an infrastructure that includes port terminals in Veracruz (North Bay and South Bay), Tampico, and Altamira, where it collectively handled </span><strong data-start="324" data-end="380"><span dir="auto">more than six million tons of cargo in 2025.</span></strong><span dir="auto"> In addition, it has a logistics and warehousing network with a presence in Veracruz, the State of Mexico, and Monterrey, whose expansion aims to strengthen warehousing, transactional logistics, and 3PL solutions for supply chains. Furthermore, it has a trucking division with </span><strong data-start="683" data-end="714"><span dir="auto">more than 170 owned vehicles</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , which complements its door-to-door service offerings.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/grupo-cice-reaches-35-years-with-a-commitment-to-expanding-its-role-in-foreign-trade-logistics/">Grupo CICE reaches 35 years with a commitment to expanding its role in foreign trade logistics</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITPAP confirms in June the operational recovery of Mexican ports ahead of the peak season</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/itpap-confirms-in-june-the-operational-recovery-of-mexican-ports-ahead-of-the-peak-season/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Average Trucking Time Indicator at Ports (ITPAP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freight transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Altamira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Lázaro Cárdenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Manzanillo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ports of Mexico]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=637293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Operations at Mexico&#8217;s main ports began to show signs of recovery just as international trade prepares for the peak season. After four consecutive months of decline, the Average Trucking Time Indicator (ITPAP) , compiled by T21 Business Intelligence , registered a further decrease in June in the time that import trucks spend within port facilities to complete the cargo [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/itpap-confirms-in-june-the-operational-recovery-of-mexican-ports-ahead-of-the-peak-season/">ITPAP confirms in June the operational recovery of Mexican ports ahead of the peak season</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Tracto-contenedor-buque-chgpt-1140x682.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Operations at Mexico&#8217;s main ports began to show signs of recovery just as international trade prepares for the peak season. After four consecutive months of decline, the </span><strong><span dir="auto">Average Trucking Time Indicator (ITPAP)</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , compiled by </span><a href="https://t21.com.mx/"><span dir="auto">T21 Business Intelligence</span></a><span dir="auto"> , registered a further decrease in June in the time that import trucks spend within port facilities to complete the cargo reception and dispatch cycle.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The average commute time decreased from 7 hours, 1 minute, and 7 seconds in May to </span><strong><span dir="auto">6 hours, 33 minutes, and 43 seconds in June</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . This reduction of 27 minutes and 24 seconds, equivalent to 6.5%, made June the best month of the first half of the year.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The indicator&#8217;s trajectory shows two clearly distinct phases. Between January and April, the average commute time increased by 4 hours, 18 minutes, and 13 seconds, equivalent to 48.9%, reaching its peak in April at 13 hours, 5 minutes, and 46 seconds. May marked the turning point, with a drop of 6 hours, 4 minutes, and 39 seconds compared to the previous month, and June continued the recovery.</span></p>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Evolution of ITPAP in 2026</span></strong></h4>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Month</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Monitored movements</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Average time</span></strong></h4>
</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">January</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">3,231</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">8:47:33</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">February</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2,618</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">11:09:20</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">March</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2,733</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">12:56:32</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">April</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2,525</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">13:05:46</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">May</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">4,139</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">7:01:07</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong><span dir="auto">June</span></strong></td>
<td><strong><span dir="auto">4,048</span></strong></td>
<td><strong><span dir="auto">6:33:43</span></strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span dir="auto">The improvement in June was distributed across the three components of the ITPAP: </span><strong><span dir="auto">customs, handling, and waiting</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . The average time spent on customs processes decreased from 3 hours, 26 minutes, and 9 seconds in May to 3 hours, 13 minutes, and 12 seconds in June, a reduction of 12 minutes and 57 seconds.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">Maneuvering time decreased from 1 hour, 33 minutes, and 52 seconds to 1 hour, 25 minutes, and 53 seconds, while waiting time decreased from 2 hours, 1 minute, and 5 seconds to 1 hour, 54 minutes, and 38 seconds. Although all three stages improved, </span><strong><span dir="auto">customs remained the longest component of the port cycle.</span></strong></p></blockquote>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">May-June comparison</span></strong></h4>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Indicator</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">May</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">June</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Variation</span></strong></h4>
</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Total time</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">7:01:07</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">6:33:43</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-0:27:24</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Customs</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">3:26:09</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">3:13:12</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-0:12:57</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Maneuvers</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:33:52</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:25:53</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-0:07:59</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Wait</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2:01:05</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:54:38</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-0:06:27</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span dir="auto">The simultaneous decrease in all three components offers </span><strong><span dir="auto">a positive signal for the logistics chain ahead of the </span><em><span dir="auto">peak season</span></em><span dir="auto"> ,</span></strong><span dir="auto"> a period that traditionally sees increased pressure on terminals, customs, yards, and trucking services. However, the performance in the coming months will determine whether this recovery is sustainable as demand grows.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">During June, 4,048 GPS movements</span></strong><span dir="auto"> were analyzed at the ports of Manzanillo, Lázaro Cárdenas, Altamira, and Veracruz, the only ports considered by ITPAP due to their importance within the National Port System. The number of movements corresponds exclusively to the monitored sample and does not represent the total number of operations at the four ports.</span></p>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas reduces the time by more than an hour, but retains the most time.</span></strong></h4>
<p><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas maintained the longest average stay among the ports evaluated in June, although it also registered one of the most significant improvements of the month. The average stay decreased from 9 hours, 31 minutes, and 19 seconds in May to </span><strong><span dir="auto">8 hours, 28 minutes, and 25 seconds</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in June.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The reduction was 1 hour, 2 minutes, and 54 seconds, equivalent to 11.0%, the second largest absolute decrease among the four venues. The result shows a significant recovery, but still leaves the </span><strong><span dir="auto">Michoacán port</span></strong><span dir="auto"> almost two hours above the ITPAP average.</span></p>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas: May-June comparison</span></strong></h4>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Indicator</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">May</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">June</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Variation</span></strong></h4>
</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Total time</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">9:31:19</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">8:28:25</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-1:02:54</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Customs</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">4:39:10</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">4:09:42</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-0:29:28</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Maneuvers</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2:06:54</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:51:02</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-0:15:52</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Wait</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2:45:14</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2:27:40</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-0:17:34</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span dir="auto">The improvement was seen in all three components. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Customs processing time was reduced by 29 minutes and 28 seconds</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , maneuvering time decreased by 15 minutes and 52 seconds, and waiting time was reduced by 17 minutes and 34 seconds.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The greatest savings were concentrated in customs, but this process continued to absorb nearly half of the port&#8217;s total processing time. In June, it reached </span><strong><span dir="auto">4 hours, 9 minutes, and 42 seconds</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , a period longer than the total processing time recorded by some ports at other times in the series.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The maneuvers also remained longer than those observed at the other facilities, while the wait exceeded two hours. Therefore, although the monthly reduction represents progress, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas still has the greatest potential</span></strong><span dir="auto"> to expedite the land transport of goods.</span></p>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Veracruz leads the monthly recovery</span></strong></h4>
<p><span dir="auto">Veracruz registered the </span><strong><span dir="auto">largest absolute and percentage reduction</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in June. Its average travel time decreased from 7 hours, 22 minutes, and 2 seconds in May to 6 hours, 15 minutes, and 26 seconds, a reduction of 1 hour, 6 minutes, and 36 seconds, equivalent to 15.1 percent.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The result placed the port below the June ITPAP average and reduced the gap with </span><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira and Manzanillo</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , the two venues with the shortest times within the ITPAP.</span></p>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Veracruz: May-June comparison</span></strong></h4>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Indicator</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">May</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">June</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Variation</span></strong></h4>
</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Total time</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">7:22:02</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">6:15:26</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-1:06:36</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Customs</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">3:33:55</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">3:04:10</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-0:29:45</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Maneuvers</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:40:02</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:26:50</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-0:13:12</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Wait</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2:08:05</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:44:25</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-0:23:40</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">The improvement was widespread.</span></strong><span dir="auto"> Customs processing time decreased by 29 minutes and 45 seconds, maneuvering time decreased by 13 minutes and 12 seconds, and waiting time decreased by 23 minutes and 40 seconds.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In percentage terms, the largest reduction was in waiting times, with a drop of approximately 18.5%. Customs and handling decreased by about 13.9% and 13.2%, respectively.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">Veracruz&#8217;s performance shows that the recovery did not depend solely on one stage of the process. The combined reduction of all three components allowed for a reduction of more than an hour in the total time and improved its ranking compared to the other ports analyzed.</span></p></blockquote>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo and Altamira consolidate operational stability</span></strong></h4>
<p><span dir="auto">While </span><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas and Veracruz</span></strong><span dir="auto"> led the port system&#8217;s recovery in June, registering the most significant reductions in their turnaround times, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo and Altamira</span></strong><span dir="auto"> remained virtually unchanged. Both ports maintained the lowest average turnaround times in the ITPAP (Port Turnaround Time Index), a sign that their operational performance held steady even after the upturn recorded in May.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The difference between the two groups of ports is significant. While the ports that had accumulated the most pressure during the first four months of the year began to recover efficiency, Manzanillo and Altamira confirmed that they operate on a </span><strong><span dir="auto">more stable basis,</span></strong><span dir="auto"> with relatively small monthly variations and turnaround times below the national average.</span></p>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo maintains one of the best performances in the system</span></strong></h4>
<p><span dir="auto">Manzanillo recorded an average travel time of </span><strong><span dir="auto">5 hours, 34 minutes, and 16 seconds</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in June , compared to 5 hours, 19 minutes, and 10 seconds in May. The increase was 15 minutes and 6 seconds, equivalent to 4.7 percent.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Although it was the only port that showed a monthly increase, it continued to rank among the facilities with the shortest stay of the monitored units and remained almost an hour below the national average.</span></p>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo: May-June comparison</span></strong></h4>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Indicator</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">May</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">June</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Variation</span></strong></h4>
</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Total time</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">5:19:10</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">5:34:16</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">+0:15:06</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Customs</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2:36:49</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2:43:36</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">+0:06:47</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Maneuvers</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:11:13</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:12:56</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">+0:01:43</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Wait</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:31:08</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:37:43</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">+0:06:35</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span dir="auto">Manzanillo&#8217;s monthly increase was primarily due to changes in customs processing times and wait times. Customs processing times rose from 2 hours, 36 minutes, and 49 seconds in May to 2 hours, 43 minutes, and 36 seconds in June, while wait times increased from 1 hour, 31 minutes, and 8 seconds to 1 hour, 37 minutes, and 43 seconds. Maneuvering times showed a smaller variation of just 1 minute and 43 seconds. Even with this adjustment, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the port maintained one of the lowest average processing times in the ITPAP (Port of Ports Administration Report)</span></strong><span dir="auto"> and remained almost an hour below the average.</span></p>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira reaffirms its operational leadership</span></strong></h4>
<p><span dir="auto">Altamira once again had </span><strong><span dir="auto">the lowest average ITPAP transit time of any port</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . In June, it recorded 5 hours, 19 minutes, and 46 seconds, just 1 minute and 24 seconds more than in May, when it reported 5 hours, 18 minutes, and 22 seconds.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The variation was only 0.4%, the lowest among the four ports evaluated, confirming a highly consistent operational behavior.</span></p>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira: May-June comparison</span></strong></h4>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Indicator</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">May</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">June</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Variation</span></strong></h4>
</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Total time</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">5:18:22</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">5:19:46</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">+0:01:24</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Customs</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2:38:33</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2:38:23</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-0:00:10</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Maneuvers</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:10:19</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:05:17</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">-0:05:02</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Wait</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:29:30</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:36:06</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">+0:06:36</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span dir="auto">Although the </span><strong><span dir="auto">overall average processing time at Altamira</span></strong><span dir="auto"> increased by only 1 minute and 24 seconds between May and June, the behavior of its components shows a different dynamic. Customs processing remained virtually unchanged, with a reduction of only 10 seconds, while maneuvering times decreased by 5 minutes and 2 seconds. However, this improvement was offset by an increase of 6 minutes and 36 seconds in waiting times, leaving the port&#8217;s overall performance virtually unchanged.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">This behavior confirms the operational stability of Altamira, which remained </span><strong><span dir="auto">the venue with the lowest average ITPAP time</span></strong><span dir="auto"> during June.</span></p>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Two dynamics explain the system&#8217;s recovery</span></strong></h4>
<p><span dir="auto">The behavior in June shows that the improvement in the indicator did not follow a homogeneous trend.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">On the one hand, Lázaro Cárdenas and Veracruz led the recovery by significantly reducing their stay times, correcting some of the deterioration accumulated during the first four months of the year.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">On the other hand, Manzanillo and Altamira maintained stable performance, with times that continued to be the lowest in the system. This combination explains the </span><strong><span dir="auto">decrease in the ITPAP average</span></strong><span dir="auto"> and reflects a more balanced operating scenario as the peak international trade season approaches.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">However, when the indicator is broken down, a common pattern persists in the four ports: customs continues to be the process that accounts for the majority of the time spent by import units.</span></p></blockquote>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Where is attention span concentrated? (June 2026)</span></strong></h4>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Port</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Customs</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Maneuvers</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Wait</span></strong></h4>
</td>
<td>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Customs participation</span></strong></h4>
</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Altamira</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2:38:23</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:05:17</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:36:06</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">49.5%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Manzanillo</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2:43:36</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:12:56</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:37:43</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">48.9%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Veracruz</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">3:04:10</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:26:50</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:44:25</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">49.1%</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">4:09:42</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">1:51:02</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">2:27:40</span></td>
<td><span dir="auto">49.1%</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">In all four ports, </span><strong><span dir="auto">customs processing</span></strong><span dir="auto"> accounts for nearly half of the total time trucks spend within the port area. This share ranges from 48.9% to 49.5%, a minimal difference that confirms customs remains the primary driver of operational productivity, regardless of the port analyzed.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Overall, the June results indicate that the Mexican port system is entering the </span><em><span dir="auto">peak season</span></em><span dir="auto"> in better shape . After registering its worst performance of the year in April, the ITPAP has now seen two consecutive months of recovery, demonstrating simultaneous improvements in customs processes, handling, and waiting times.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The challenge for the second half of the year will no longer be simply maintaining the downward trend observed in May and June, but </span><strong><span dir="auto">demonstrating that the port system can absorb the seasonal increase in cargo</span></strong><span dir="auto"> without returning to the congestion levels recorded during the first four months. The </span><em><span dir="auto">peak season</span></em><span dir="auto"> will test whether the recovery observed by ITPAP represents a structural change in operations or merely a temporary improvement before the surge in demand.</span></p>
<div class="jnews_inline_related_post_wrapper right">
<div class="jnews_inline_related_post">
<div class="jeg_postblock_21 jeg_postblock jeg_module_hook jeg_pagination_nextprev jeg_col_2o3 jnews_module_679518_0_6a6a97ca06611   " data-unique="jnews_module_679518_0_6a6a97ca06611">
<div class="jeg_block_container">
<div class="jeg_posts jeg_load_more_flag">
<article class="jeg_post jeg_pl_sm format-standard">
<div class="jeg_postblock_content">
<div class="jeg_post_meta"></div>
</div>
</article>
<article class="jeg_post jeg_pl_sm format-standard">
<div class="jeg_thumb">
<div class="thumbnail-container animate-lazy  size-715 "><span dir="auto">The ITPAP is built upon the monitoring of trucking units using GPS technology that carry out import operations in </span><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira, Manzanillo, Veracruz, and Lázaro Cárdenas</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . Each trip allows for measuring the total time spent within the port area and breaking it down into three components: customs, maneuvering, and waiting.</span></div>
</div>
</article>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p><span dir="auto">During June 2026, the indicator was compiled using a sample of 4,048 movements. Therefore, the results reflect only the behavior of the monitored operations and not the total universe of port movements.</span></p>
<h4><strong><span dir="auto">Delays also have a cost for trucking.</span></strong></h4>
<p><span dir="auto">Although operational performance varies between ports and periods, the reality is that none of the country&#8217;s major port facilities are immune to episodes of </span><strong><span dir="auto">saturation, congestion, or operational complexities</span></strong><span dir="auto"> that ultimately affect the flow of trucking. Beyond the amount of time a tractor-trailer spends inside the port, these conditions directly impact the productivity of trucking companies, increase their operating costs, and reduce the capacity available to serve the market.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">An analysis prepared by </span><strong><span dir="auto">T21 Business Intelligence</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , with information provided by trucking companies, shows that delays recorded at ports generate economic losses that transcend carriers and end up being reflected throughout the logistics chain.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">In the case of Altamira, the companies consulted estimate that </span><strong><span dir="auto">the delays could reduce the productivity of their units by up to 30%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . Considering the average monthly revenue per tractor-trailer and a flow of approximately three thousand daily entries to the port, the economic impact of lost productivity could exceed </span><strong><span dir="auto">nine billion pesos per month.</span></strong></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">The problem is not unique to one port. Extrapolating the analysis to Manzanillo, Lázaro Cárdenas, Veracruz, and Altamira, the country&#8217;s four main commercial ports, reveals that </span><strong><span dir="auto">more than 10,000 trucks enter daily</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , meaning that any increase in service times has a multiplier effect on equipment availability, driver utilization, and logistics costs.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In Manzanillo, for example, the transport companies consulted indicate that the delays force them, on average, to </span><strong><span dir="auto">add 7.5 additional double-trailer trucks</span></strong><span dir="auto"> to maintain the same level of service. Beyond the additional investment in assets, this situation means that existing units stop generating revenue, which, in total, translates to more than </span><strong><span dir="auto">two billion pesos in lost sales.</span></strong></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Data from the </span><strong><a href="https://t21.com.mx/top-cien/"><span dir="auto">Top 100 Trucking® report</span></a><span dir="auto"> , compiled by Grupo T21,</span></strong><span dir="auto"> supports this loss of productivity. While the average monthly mileage of the country&#8217;s leading companies reaches 13,125 kilometers per unit, and some even exceed 25,000 kilometers, there are companies whose operations are highly concentrated in ports and whose tractor-trailers barely travel between 5,000 and 8,000 kilometers per month, reflecting the time they remain idle waiting to complete their operational cycle.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn: </span><a id="menurj3" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-ny-medios/" href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Link @GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/itpap-confirms-in-june-the-operational-recovery-of-mexican-ports-ahead-of-the-peak-season/">ITPAP confirms in June the operational recovery of Mexican ports ahead of the peak season</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mediterranean Shipping Company incorporates PAMEX service at Grupo CICE terminal in Veracruz</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/mediterranean-shipping-company-incorporates-pamex-service-at-grupo-cice-terminal-in-veracruz/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 22:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CICE GROUP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Containerized cargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOREIGN TRADE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MARIMTIE TRANSPORT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean Shipping Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAMEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=636915</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) began operations of its new regular PAMEX service at the Grupo CICE Semi-Specialized Container and Project Cargo Terminal , located in the North Bay of the Port of Veracruz. The service officially began on July 4th with the docking of the MSC KEY F vessel , marking the start of a weekly containerized cargo operation aimed at serving [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/mediterranean-shipping-company-incorporates-pamex-service-at-grupo-cice-terminal-in-veracruz/">Mediterranean Shipping Company incorporates PAMEX service at Grupo CICE terminal in Veracruz</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/CICE.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="https://www.msc.com/"><span dir="auto">Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC)</span></a><span dir="auto"> began operations of its new regular </span><a href="https://enviospamex.com/"><span dir="auto">PAMEX service at the </span></a><a href="https://home.grupocice.com/ciceenlinea/"><span dir="auto">Grupo CICE</span></a><span dir="auto"> Semi-Specialized Container and Project Cargo Terminal , located in the North Bay of the Port of Veracruz.</span></p>
<p class="isSelectedEnd"><span dir="auto">The service officially began on July 4th with the docking of the </span><strong><span dir="auto">MSC KEY F</span></strong><span dir="auto"> vessel , marking the start of a weekly containerized cargo operation aimed at serving import and export markets.</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="isSelectedEnd"><span dir="auto">According to information released by </span><strong><span dir="auto">Grupo CICE</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , the PAMEX service will initially consist of the ships </span><strong><span dir="auto">MSC KEY F and MSC NORDEROOG</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , and includes four weekly calls that will strategically connect the ports of Veracruz, Altamira and Cristóbal, with the aim of expanding logistical options for foreign trade.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="isSelectedEnd"><span dir="auto">The addition of this service strengthens the maritime connectivity of the Port of Veracruz and expands the range of services offered by the Grupo CICE terminal in the North Bay to support foreign trade operations.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Grupo CICE stated that the incorporation of the PAMEX service is part of its strategy to strengthen port infrastructure and services, as well as maintain alliances with international shipping lines operating in Mexico.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:   </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<div class="jeg_ad jeg_ad_article jnews_content_inline_ads  ">
<div class="ads-wrapper align-center ">
<div class="ads_code"></div>
</div>
</div>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/mediterranean-shipping-company-incorporates-pamex-service-at-grupo-cice-terminal-in-veracruz/">Mediterranean Shipping Company incorporates PAMEX service at Grupo CICE terminal in Veracruz</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICAVE accelerates its autonomous path with an investment of 62.8 million pesos</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/icave-accelerates-its-autonomous-path-with-an-investment-of-62-8-million-pesos/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 21:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asipona Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUTONOMOUS CRANES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hutchison Ports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hutchison Ports Icave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PORT CRANES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ports of Mexico]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=636078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Pressure to reduce emissions and accelerate operational efficiency has begun to shift the types of investments within Mexican ports. In Veracruz, Hutchison Ports ICAVE decided to move in this direction with an investment of over 62.8 million pesos (US$3.6 million) aimed at electrifying and automating some of its internal operations, a strategy that also reflects how port operators are [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/icave-accelerates-its-autonomous-path-with-an-investment-of-62-8-million-pesos/">ICAVE accelerates its autonomous path with an investment of 62.8 million pesos</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Hutchison-Ports-ICAVE-grua-autonoma-hph.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Pressure to reduce emissions and accelerate operational efficiency has begun to shift the types of investments within Mexican ports. In Veracruz, </span><a href="https://hutchisonportsicave.com/es"><span dir="auto">Hutchison Ports ICAVE</span></a><span dir="auto"> decided to move in this direction with an investment of over 62.8 million pesos (US$3.6 million) aimed at </span><strong><span dir="auto">electrifying and automating</span></strong><span dir="auto"> some of its internal operations, a strategy that also reflects how port operators are seeking to meet greater logistical demands without losing competitiveness.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The terminal has added six new </span><strong><span dir="auto">Autonomous Trucks</span></strong><span dir="auto"> for the horizontal transport of containers within the port area. These trucks join six other units already in operation, bringing the autonomous fleet to 12 driverless vehicles. The investment allocated exclusively to this expansion totaled approximately 32.5 million pesos (US$1.9 million).</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">Beyond the technological incorporation, the move also demonstrates the terminal&#8217;s commitment to automating processes considered critical within port operations, particularly those related to the </span><strong><span dir="auto">internal movement of containers</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , where operational continuity, maneuvering precision and the reduction of incidents are beginning to gain importance compared to traditional models intensive in diesel equipment and operational labor.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">The strategy also included the acquisition of </span><strong><span dir="auto">three electric reach stackers</span></strong><span dir="auto"> for handling full containers and two electric flatbed trucks, machinery intended to replace conventional diesel equipment. The investment in the reach stackers exceeded 25 million pesos (US$1.4 million), while the flatbed trucks represented approximately 5.3 million pesos (US$290,000).</span></p>
<div class="jeg_preview_slider gallery_1" data-selector="gallery_1">
<div class="jeg_preview_holder">
<div class="jeg_preview_media">
<div class="jeg_preview_media_holder">
<div class="jeg_preview_media_content">
<div class="jeg_preview_media_content_holder_padding">
<div class="jeg_preview_media_content_holder"><img decoding="async" class="jeg_preview_hide" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ICAVE-5.jpeg" /></div>
</div>
<div class="jeg_preview_media_content_navigation">
<div class="next"><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ICAVE-4.jpeg" /></div>
<div><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ICAVE-11.jpeg" /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p><span dir="auto">The addition of this equipment comes at a time when ports face a double pressure: increasing capacity to handle larger foreign trade flows and, at the same time, </span><strong><span dir="auto">responding to</span></strong><span dir="auto"> increasingly strict environmental commitments driven by both global customers and international logistics chains.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">“The incorporation of electric and autonomous equipment is part of a comprehensive transformation of our operation. We are not only seeking greater efficiency, but also moving towards </span><strong><span dir="auto">a cleaner, more innovative port model, prepared</span></strong><span dir="auto"> for the logistical and environmental challenges of the coming decades,” said Javier Rodríguez Miranda, general manager of Hutchison Ports ICAVE, quoted in a press release.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">The executive announced that the new Autonomous Trucks will begin formal operations during June 2026 and that the terminal plans to later integrate them into </span><strong><span dir="auto">rail operations</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , a component that could expand the scope of automation within the port of Veracruz and strengthen the terminal&#8217;s intermodal connection.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The company estimates that this technological transition will </span><strong><span dir="auto">reduce CO₂ emissions by approximately 58%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to using conventional diesel equipment. According to the terminal&#8217;s operational calculations, six diesel tractor-trailers generate around 58.5 tons of CO₂, while six 100% electric Autonomous Trucks produce approximately 24.3 tons.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The commitment is part of Hutchison Ports&#8217; global NET Zero strategy, which aims to reduce absolute Scope 1 and 2 </span><strong><span dir="auto">Greenhouse Gas (GHG)</span></strong><span dir="auto"> emissions by 54.6% by 2033, using 2021 levels as a baseline. The group has also set a goal of achieving net-zero emissions across its entire value chain by 2050.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The operational context is also significant. According to figures from the </span><a href="https://www.puertodeveracruz.com.mx/"><span dir="auto">National Port System Administration (Asipona) Veracruz</span></a><span dir="auto"> , the port handled approximately </span><strong><span dir="auto">1.3 million TEUs (20-foot equivalent units)</span></strong><span dir="auto"> and over 30 million tons of cargo during 2025, solidifying its position as one of the country&#8217;s most important logistics hubs and the leading port in the Gulf of Mexico for container traffic.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In this environment, automation and electrification are beginning to emerge not only as an environmental strategy, but also as a tool to sustain productivity, operational availability, and responsiveness to </span><strong><span dir="auto">increasingly demanding and specialized logistics chains.</span></strong></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn: </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/icave-accelerates-its-autonomous-path-with-an-investment-of-62-8-million-pesos/">ICAVE accelerates its autonomous path with an investment of 62.8 million pesos</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICAVE modernizes its operational capacity in Veracruz</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/icave-modernizes-its-operational-capacity-in-veracruz/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 23:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hutchison Ports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hutchison Ports Icave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hutchison Ports México]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PORT EQUIPMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ports of Mexico]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=635109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The arrival of new equipment at the Port of Veracruz comes at a time when pressure for operational efficiency and emissions reduction is beginning to redefine investments in port infrastructure. In this context, Hutchison Ports ICAVE announced a capital injection of more than 540 million pesos (US$30 million) , aimed at strengthening its technological capabilities and advancing its environmental [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/icave-modernizes-its-operational-capacity-in-veracruz/">ICAVE modernizes its operational capacity in Veracruz</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Hutchison-ports-ICAVE-nuevas-gruas-hph.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The arrival of new equipment at the Port of Veracruz comes at a time when pressure for operational efficiency and emissions reduction is beginning to redefine investments in port infrastructure. In this context, </span><a href="https://hutchisonportsicave.com/es"><span dir="auto">Hutchison Ports ICAVE</span></a><span dir="auto"> announced a </span><strong><span dir="auto">capital injection of more than 540 million pesos (US$30 million)</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , aimed at strengthening its technological capabilities and advancing its environmental agenda.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The investment has resulted in the addition of </span><strong><span dir="auto">a Super Post Panamax gantry crane and five electric RTG cranes</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , all manufactured by </span><a href="https://www.zpmc.com/"><span dir="auto">ZPMC</span></a><span dir="auto"> . With these new cranes, the terminal aims to address both the increasing size of vessels and the need to optimize operational flows in the yard and at the dock. The new dockside crane, with a reach of up to 24 rows of containers, is designed to handle the large-scale vessels that dominate international shipping routes—a factor that is no longer merely aspirational, but a reality in the world&#8217;s major ports.</span></p>
<div class="jeg_preview_slider gallery_1" data-selector="gallery_1">
<div class="jeg_preview_holder">
<div class="jeg_preview_media">
<div class="jeg_preview_media_holder">
<div class="jeg_preview_media_content">
<div class="jeg_preview_media_content_holder_padding">
<div class="jeg_preview_media_content_holder"><img decoding="async" class="jeg_preview_hide" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ICAVE-nuevas-gruas-abril-2026-2-hph-scaled.jpeg" /></div>
<div><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ICAVE-nuevas-gruas-abril-2026-3-hph-scaled.jpeg" /></div>
<div><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ICAVE-nuevas-gruas-abril-2026-4-hph-scaled.jpeg" /></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p><span dir="auto">These types of improvements not only aim to increase capacity but also to </span><strong><span dir="auto">reduce operational friction</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . Precise maneuvering, advanced control, and the ability to handle larger vessels position the terminal more competitively in an environment where loading and unloading times are increasingly critical for logistics chains.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">In parallel, the incorporation of electric RTG cranes introduces a component that is beginning to gain traction in the port debate: </span><strong><span dir="auto">the energy transition</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . “These 100% electric units stand out for their energy efficiency and innovative emissions reduction systems, which not only optimize operating times but also contribute to a significant decrease in the carbon footprint of the terminal&#8217;s daily activities,” stated Javier Rodríguez Miranda, General Manager of Hutchison Ports ICAVE, in a press release.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">The emphasis on electrical equipment is not isolated. According to the executive, this investment aligns with </span><strong><span dir="auto">Hutchison Ports&#8217; global Net Zero</span></strong><span dir="auto"> strategy , which aims for a 54.6% reduction in absolute greenhouse gas emissions (scopes 1 and 2) by 2033, as well as the goal of achieving net-zero emissions across its entire value chain by 2050. In other words, technological modernization is becoming closely linked to measurable environmental commitments, moving beyond mere rhetoric.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">At the operational level, the terminal anticipates improvements in its handling capacity and vessel turnaround times, critical variables in a port like Veracruz, where the demand for port services coexists with the need to avoid bottlenecks. The addition of this equipment is part of a broader infrastructure upgrade process, which includes the </span><strong><span dir="auto">adoption of electric and, gradually, automated solutions.</span></strong></p>
<p><span dir="auto">However, the underlying issue goes beyond a simple fleet expansion. The investment in state-of-the-art equipment reflects a broader trend in the industry: ports are no longer just competing on volume, but also on </span><strong><span dir="auto">efficiency, sustainability, and the ability to adapt</span></strong><span dir="auto"> to an increasingly demanding maritime trade.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">With this investment, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Hutchison Ports ICAVE</span></strong><span dir="auto"> reinforces its position within the national port system, at a time when modernization is no longer a competitive advantage but a necessary condition to sustain operations in the long term.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">This terminal upgrade comes at a time when </span><strong><span dir="auto">ICAVE has handled 164,553 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs)</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in the first two months of this year, 8.4% more than the same period last year, according to information from the port authority.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn: </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/icave-modernizes-its-operational-capacity-in-veracruz/">ICAVE modernizes its operational capacity in Veracruz</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investigation underway into the origin of hydrocarbons surrounding a CMA CGM vessel in the port of Veracruz</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/investigation-underway-into-the-origin-of-hydrocarbons-surrounding-a-cma-cgm-vessel-in-the-port-of-veracruz/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 22:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asipona Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA CGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hutchison Ports Icave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAVE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIL SPILL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SECRETARIAT OF THE NAVY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=634999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The detection of hydrocarbons in the port of Veracruz , reported on April 4 by the Mexican Navy (Semar) , comes at a time when the traceability of contaminants in the Gulf of Mexico discovered since the beginning of March of this year has become unclear. Regarding the CMA CGM Moliere vessel —docked since March 27 at pier 14 of ICAVE —authorities confirmed [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/investigation-underway-into-the-origin-of-hydrocarbons-surrounding-a-cma-cgm-vessel-in-the-port-of-veracruz/">Investigation underway into the origin of hydrocarbons surrounding a CMA CGM vessel in the port of Veracruz</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/CMA-CGM-Moliere-Veracruz-annm.png" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The </span><strong><span dir="auto">detection of hydrocarbons in the port of Veracruz</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , reported on April 4 by the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Mexican Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , comes at a time when the traceability of contaminants in the Gulf of Mexico discovered since the beginning of March of this year has become unclear. Regarding the </span><strong><span dir="auto">CMA CGM Moliere</span></strong><span dir="auto"> vessel —docked since March 27 at pier 14 of </span><a href="https://hutchisonportsicave.com/es"><span dir="auto">ICAVE</span></a><span dir="auto"> —authorities confirmed the presence of residue, but not its origin, opening a front of uncertainty that transcends this specific incident and is part of a regional context marked by spills with no clear cause and ongoing operational repercussions.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">According to a statement issued by the Mexican Navy (Semar) on April 4, naval personnel conducted reconnaissance and cleanup operations after </span><strong><span dir="auto">detecting oil slicks and iridescent patterns on the water&#8217;s surface</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in the port of Veracruz. The hydrocarbons were contained within booms placed around the vessel—owned by the French company </span><a href="https://www.cma-cgm.com/"><span dir="auto">CMA CGM</span></a><span dir="auto"> —in an area of ​​approximately 20 by 30 meters, from which nearly 180 kilograms of contaminated material were collected.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">The document also provides a relevant temporal element: since the ship&#8217;s arrival on March 27, the </span><strong><span dir="auto">presence of these containment barriers</span></strong><span dir="auto"> had already been confirmed , suggesting that the event was neither immediate nor necessarily public from its origin.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Despite this, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the Navy avoids establishing a direct causal link</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . Instead of attributing the spill, it merely notes the presence of hydrocarbons &#8220;in the vicinity&#8221; of the vessel and confirms that no contamination was detected outside the contained area.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">More than a week after the ship&#8217;s arrival, and with the incident already under control and in its containment phase, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the source of the contaminant remains undetermined . In this context, a source close to the incident investigation told T21 that a </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">certified underwater inspection</span></strong><span dir="auto"> of the vessel will be carried out this Wednesday, April 8 , to verify whether or not there is a connection between the ship and the presence of the hydrocarbon.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In contrast to the statement issued by the Navy on April 4, the </span><a href="https://www.puertodeveracruz.com.mx/"><span dir="auto">Veracruz Port Authority (Asipona)</span></a><span dir="auto"> has not yet published an official statement on the incident through its institutional channels, despite it occurring within the port area under its administration. This is particularly relevant considering the operational importance of the Port of Veracruz, which in 2025 ranked third nationally in container handling, </span><strong><span dir="auto">with 1,299,337 TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) moved</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , surpassed only by Manzanillo and Lázaro Cárdenas, according to data from the port authority itself.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">For its part, </span><strong><span dir="auto">T21 sought out CMA CGM executives</span></strong><span dir="auto"> to learn their position after the events that occurred between March 27 and April 4; however, the shipping company declined to offer statements at this time.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">A navigation specialist who requested anonymity told T21 that the ship&#8217;s captain may have requested the </span><strong><span dir="auto">cleaning of the vessel&#8217;s hull</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in anticipation of a possible denial of entry to its next ports of call due to hydrocarbon pollution, such as the port of Houston, Texas.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">This situation has begun to affect port operations. The presence of the CMA CGM Moliere vessel at the ICAVE terminal, while the origin of the hydrocarbon is being clarified, </span><strong><span dir="auto">has already led to delays in the arrival and servicing of other vessels</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , which anticipates disruptions to the logistics chain for foreign trade users, particularly importers and exporters.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">In addition, the ICAVE terminal itself has been unable to unload a ship that arrived this week with </span><strong><span dir="auto">new equipment</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , including dock and yard cranes, which adds pressure to operations at a port that remains one of the main container hubs in the country.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">The impact comes in an already tense context. Since early March, an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico—whose origin has yet to be determined by federal authorities—has begun to affect regional maritime operations. Alerts from the logistics sector indicate that shipping companies such as </span><a href="https://la.one-line.com/es"><span dir="auto">Ocean Network Express (ONE)</span></a><span dir="auto"> have reported </span><strong><span dir="auto">navigation restrictions, vessel diversions, delays, and additional costs</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in ports like Veracruz and Altamira.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">While there is no confirmation that </span><strong><span dir="auto">the two events are linked</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , the temporal coincidence between an active regional spill and a local incident with no defined traceability introduces an additional factor of pressure on port operations.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Thus, what began as an event contained in a delimited area evolves into a broader scenario: hydrocarbons whose origin has not been determined, operations that begin to feel its effects, and </span><strong><span dir="auto">a logistics chain that, faced with uncertainty, begins to adjust times and costs</span></strong><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/enrique-duarte-rionda-a0714647/"><span dir="auto">@Enrique Duarte Rionda</span></a><span dir="auto">  /  </span><a id="menurj3" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-ny-medios/" href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Link @GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/investigation-underway-into-the-origin-of-hydrocarbons-surrounding-a-cma-cgm-vessel-in-the-port-of-veracruz/">Investigation underway into the origin of hydrocarbons surrounding a CMA CGM vessel in the port of Veracruz</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vehicle traffic through Mexican ports falls in February</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/vehicle-traffic-through-mexican-ports-falls-in-february/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 21:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Altamira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Lázaro Cárdenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PORT OF MANZATLÁN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PORT OF TUXPAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VEHICLE MOBILIZATION]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=634755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In February 2026, the movement of vehicles through the main Mexican ports registered a drop of 20.9% compared to the same month in 2025, with a total of 119,711 units, according to figures from the National Port System of the Secretariat of the Navy (Semar) . An analysis by T21 Business Intelligence showed that 9,218 units were moved through the port of Mazatlán, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/vehicle-traffic-through-mexican-ports-falls-in-february/">Vehicle traffic through Mexican ports falls in February</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Autos1.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In February 2026, </span><strong><span dir="auto">the movement of vehicles through the main Mexican ports </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">registered a drop of 20.9%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to the same month in 2025, with a total of 119,711 units, according to figures from the National Port System of the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Secretariat of the Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">An analysis by </span><a href="https://t21.com.mx/"><span dir="auto">T21 Business Intelligence</span></a><span dir="auto"> showed that </span><strong><span dir="auto">9,218 units were moved through the port of Mazatlán, Sinaloa, in the second month of the year</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , 39.4% less than in the same period of 2025. Meanwhile, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas, Michoacán, experienced a decline in vehicle traffic in February 2026, with 36,955 units</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , representing a decrease of 23.3% compared to the same month last year.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">The port of Tuxpan, in Veracruz, handled 2,833 units</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , 22.2% fewer than in February 2025. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira, Tamaulipas, registered a 17.4% drop in vehicles handled</span></strong><span dir="auto"> during the second month of 2026, with 28,176 units. </span><strong><span dir="auto">The port of Veracruz reported a 15.2% year-over-year decrease</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , totaling 42,529 units handled during the period.</span></p>
<p><iframe id="datawrapper-chart-8q8NV" title="Monthly car movement Jan-Feb 2026" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/8q8NV/1/" width="600" height="402" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Small multiple column chart" data-external="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-31="true" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">The cumulative total for January-February 2026 showed a decline of 4.4%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to the same period in 2025, with an operation of 256,936 vehicles.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">During the period, two ports reported growth. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Mazatlán showed a 30.7% increase</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to the same period in 2015, with 31,864 vehicles handled. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Veracruz, for its part, saw a 13.8% increase in the first two months of the year</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , totaling 89,413 units operated.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In contrast, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Tuxpan saw a 48.8% drop</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in the cumulative total for 2026 compared to the same period in 2025, with 2,833 units transported. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas declined by 20.1%, totaling </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">81,514 units operated</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in the first two months of 2026. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira experienced an 11.8% year-on-year contraction</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , registering 51,312 units.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Regarding the participation by port in February 2026, Veracruz concentrated the largest number of vehicles moved with 36%, followed by Lázaro Cárdenas with 31%, Altamira with 24%, Mazatlán with 8% and Tuxpan with 2 percent.</span></p>
<p><iframe id="datawrapper-chart-7OaXh" title="Part. Total (%) Vehicle Movement (Feb-26)" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/7OaXh/1/" width="600" height="392" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Circle chart" data-external="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-31="true" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p>
<p><strong><span class="s1"><span dir="auto">In February 2026, </span></span><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">311,457 units were produced </span></span></strong><span class="s1"><strong><span dir="auto">in the country</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , 1.80% less than in the same period last year. In the </span><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">January-February period of this year</span></span><span dir="auto"> , automotive plants located in Mexico manufactured  </span><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">625,774 light vehicles</span></span><span dir="auto"> , representing a  </span><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">negative variation of 0.58% </span></span><span dir="auto"> compared to the same period in 2025.</span></span></p>
<p><span class="s1"><span dir="auto">Meanwhile, during the first two months of 2026, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Mexico exported </span></strong></span><strong><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">485,426 light vehicles</span></span></strong><span class="s1"><span dir="auto"> , a figure that implied a  </span></span><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">growth of 1.36% </span></span><span class="s1"><span dir="auto">compared to the same period in 2025, despite the annual drop of 4.45% that exports registered in February, with </span><span class="s2"><span dir="auto">247,945 vehicles, according</span></span></span><span dir="auto"> to the </span><a href="https://www.inegi.org.mx/"><span dir="auto">National Institute of Statistics and Geography (Inegi)</span></a><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/vehicle-traffic-through-mexican-ports-falls-in-february/">Vehicle traffic through Mexican ports falls in February</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican ports start 2026 with an increase in TEU movement</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/mexican-ports-start-2026-with-an-increase-in-teu-movement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 18:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONTAINER MOVEMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Containerized cargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lázaro Cárdenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manzanillo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Mazatlán]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEU]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=634025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mexico&#8217;s ports started 2026 on the &#8220;right foot&#8221;, moving 797,906 twenty-foot containers (TEUs) , which meant an 8.8% increase compared to January 2025, according to figures from the Secretariat of the Navy (Semar) . An analysis by  T21 Business Intelligence showed that Lázaro Cárdenas, in Michoacán, handled 235,103 TEUs during the first month of this year, 21.8% more than in January 2026, while [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/mexican-ports-start-2026-with-an-increase-in-teu-movement/">Mexican ports start 2026 with an increase in TEU movement</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Puerto-de-Manzanillo-2-asipona.jpg" /></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Mexico&#8217;s ports </span></strong><strong><span dir="auto">started 2026 on the &#8220;right foot&#8221;, moving 797,906 twenty-foot containers (TEUs)</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , which meant an 8.8% increase compared to January 2025, according to figures from the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Secretariat of the Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">An analysis by  </span><a href="https://t21.com.mx/"><span dir="auto">T21 Business Intelligence</span></a><span dir="auto"> showed that </span><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas, in Michoacán, handled 235,103 TEUs</span></strong><span dir="auto"> during the first month of this year, 21.8% more than in January 2026, while the port of </span><strong><span dir="auto">Veracruz moved 93,032 TEUs</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , representing an increase of 13.8% in the period.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo, in Colima</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , was the port that registered the most container movement at the beginning of 2026, with a total of </span><strong><span dir="auto">354,534 TEUs, an increase of 7.8%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to the same cycle of 2025.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In contrast, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira, in Tamaulipas, continued its downward trend</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . In January 2026, it handled 63,374 TEUs, representing a 9.3% drop compared to January 2025, marking two consecutive months of decline.</span></p>
<p><iframe id="datawrapper-chart-fpUpT" title="Monthly container movement Jan 2026 (TEU)" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/fpUpT/1/" width="600" height="490" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Bar chart" data-external="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-33="true" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe><br />
<span dir="auto">Smaller ports also saw significant variations in January 2026 compared to the same month in 2025. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Guaymas, in Sonora, reported a 95.3% increase</span></strong><span dir="auto"> with 1,586 TEUs handled during the period. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Mazatlán, in Sinaloa, experienced a 35.1% decrease</span></strong><span dir="auto"> with 2,284 TEUs handled.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Regarding participation in the first month of 2026, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo accounted for 44.43% of the total movement of 20-foot containers</span></strong><span dir="auto"> ; Lázaro Cárdenas had 29.46%, Veracruz 11.66%, and Altamira 7.94 percent.</span></p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" id="datawrapper-chart-rV0r8" title="Part. Total (%) Container Movement (Jan-25)" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/rV0r8/1/" width="600" height="504" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" aria-label="Circle chart" data-external="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-33="true" data-mce-fragment="1"></iframe></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Faced with less than encouraging growth forecasts, Mexico&#8217;s main ports are emerging as key points to sustain the country&#8217;s competitiveness.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In that context, 2026 presents a mixed economic outlook for Mexico: while the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/shcp"><span dir="auto">Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (SHCP)</span></a><span dir="auto"> projected a growth of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of between 1.8% and 2.8%, the </span><a href="https://www.oecd.org/en.html"><span dir="auto">Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)</span></a><span dir="auto"> forecasts an expansion of 1.4% for the Mexican economy.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a id="menurj3" class="fui-Link ___1q1shib f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1s184ao f1mk8lai fnbmjn9 f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-ny-medios/" href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Link @GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/mexican-ports-start-2026-with-an-increase-in-teu-movement/">Mexican ports start 2026 with an increase in TEU movement</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lázaro Cárdenas puts pressure on the road transport clock again</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/lazaro-cardenas-puts-pressure-on-the-road-transport-clock-again/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 19:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVERAGE TRUCKING TIME INDICATOR AAT PORTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Altamira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Lázaro Cárdenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Manzanillo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ports of Mexico]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=632871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Mexican port system closed November 2025 without clear signs of relief in truck transit times. The Average Truck Transit Times Indicator at Ports (ITPAP) , developed by T21 Business Intelligence, confirms that the logistical pressure observed in October not only persists but is redistributed among the main hubs, with Lázaro Cárdenas again being the primary source of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/lazaro-cardenas-puts-pressure-on-the-road-transport-clock-again/">Lázaro Cárdenas puts pressure on the road transport clock again</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Puerto-de-Lazaro-Cardenas-automoviles-edr.jpg" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The Mexican port system closed November 2025 without clear signs of relief in truck transit times. The </span><strong><span dir="auto">Average Truck Transit Times Indicator at Ports (ITPAP)</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , developed by T21 Business Intelligence, confirms that the logistical pressure observed in October not only persists but is redistributed among the main hubs, with </span><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas again being the primary source of strain</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , but also showing significant trends in Manzanillo, Altamira, and Veracruz.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In October, the ITPAP recorded an overall average time of 10 hours, 57 minutes, and 45 seconds. </span><strong><span dir="auto">By November, this figure had risen to 11 hours, 19 minutes, and 25 seconds</span></strong><span dir="auto"> —an increase that, while not abrupt, is significant in an environment where every additional minute impacts costs, logistical windows, and operational reliability. The monthly comparison reveals that the system did not regain its fluidity but instead entered a phase of increased friction.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas once again exceeded the national average. In October, it had already recorded an average wait time of 13 hours and 45 minutes, putting pressure on the overall indicator; </span><strong><span dir="auto">in November, this climbed to 14 hours, 2 minutes, and 30 seconds</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . This trend confirms that the port&#8217;s operational growth continues to be accompanied by bottlenecks that have not yet been resolved. A breakdown of the wait times shows that customs remains the primary source of pressure, followed by prolonged waiting periods—a combination that keeps trucking vehicles within the port area longer than desired.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">Manzanillo, for its part, showed a different dynamic, though not without its challenges. In October, this port averaged around 9 hours of wait time, with a relatively stable balance between maneuvering, customs, and waiting. </span><strong><span dir="auto">In November, the total time reached 9 hours, 54 minutes, and 7 seconds</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , a moderate increase that suggests a greater operational workload, but without reaching the critical levels of Lázaro Cárdenas. However, the increase in wait times and the persistence of prolonged customs processes indicate that Manzanillo&#8217;s efficiency remains fragile and highly dependent on daily coordination.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira offers a different perspective within the Gulf region</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . In October, the port remained below the national average, with times close to 9 hours. By November, the average time had decreased to 8 hours, 2 minutes, and 21 seconds, positioning it as one of the ports with the shortest truck transit times. Even so, customs continued to represent the largest component of the total time, demonstrating that even in ports with less relative pressure, inspection and release processes still dictate the pace of cargo departure.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Veracruz, meanwhile, showed relative stability between the two months</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . In October, it was slightly below the overall average, and in November, it registered an average dwell time of 8 hours, 8 minutes, and 28 seconds. Although its maneuvering times remained relatively stable, customs again accounted for more than half of the total time, confirming that the port&#8217;s efficiency is less tied to terminal operations and more dependent on regulatory processes.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">The component-by-component analysis reinforces this interpretation. </span><strong><span dir="auto">In November, the overall average time at customs was 5 hours, 32 minutes, and 54 seconds</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , higher than the figures for October, while the average wait time reached 3 hours, 18 minutes, and 51 seconds. The maneuvering phase, at 2 hours, 27 minutes, and 39 seconds, remains the most controlled segment, but insufficient to offset the accumulated delays in the other stages.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">The ITPAP report once again demonstrates that the discussion on port competitiveness cannot focus solely on capacity or infrastructure. The comparison between October and November makes it clear that the efficiency of trucking remains trapped in processes that are moving slower than demand. Lázaro Cárdenas bears the brunt of the pressure, but Manzanillo, Altamira, and Veracruz confirm that the challenge is systemic: </span><strong><span dir="auto">reducing downtime remains an outstanding issue for the Mexican port system</span></strong><span dir="auto"> .</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on X:  </span><a href="https://twitter.com/GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/lazaro-cardenas-puts-pressure-on-the-road-transport-clock-again/">Lázaro Cárdenas puts pressure on the road transport clock again</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Container traffic: moderate growth and decline in key ports</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/container-traffic-moderate-growth-and-decline-in-key-ports/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 19:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FEATURED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATIONAL PORT SYSTEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Altamira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Lázaro Cárdenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Manzanillo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T21 Business Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEU]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=632785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mexican ports showed positive signs in the period January-November 2025. According to figures from the Secretariat of the Navy (Semar) , seven million 930 thousand 438 twenty-foot containers (TEU) were handled during that period , which meant a growth of 2.2% compared to the same period in 2024. However, November 2025 saw a decline in operations, reporting 794,996 TEUs, a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/container-traffic-moderate-growth-and-decline-in-key-ports/">Container traffic: moderate growth and decline in key ports</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-664612 size-full" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ssa_mexico_mzlo_1ok_0.jpg" sizes="(max-width: 1170px) 100vw, 1170px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ssa_mexico_mzlo_1ok_0.jpg 1170w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ssa_mexico_mzlo_1ok_0-300x179.jpg 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ssa_mexico_mzlo_1ok_0-1024x613.jpg 1024w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ssa_mexico_mzlo_1ok_0-768x459.jpg 768w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ssa_mexico_mzlo_1ok_0-600x359.jpg 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ssa_mexico_mzlo_1ok_0-150x90.jpg 150w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ssa_mexico_mzlo_1ok_0-750x449.jpg 750w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ssa_mexico_mzlo_1ok_0-1140x682.jpg 1140w" alt="" width="1170" height="700" data-pin-no-hover="true" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Mexican ports showed positive signs in the period January-November 2025. According to figures from the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/semar"><span dir="auto">Secretariat of the Navy (Semar)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , seven million 930 thousand 438 twenty-foot containers (TEU) were handled during that period </span><strong><span dir="auto">, which meant a growth of 2.2%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to the same period in 2024.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">However, November 2025 saw a decline in operations, reporting </span><strong><span dir="auto">794,996 TEUs, a 2.8% decrease compared to the same period last year</span></strong><span dir="auto"> . The most important ports showed mixed results in their November performance compared to the cumulative total for the first 11 months of the year.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_664582" class="wp-caption alignnone" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-664582">
<p><figure id="attachment_664582" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-664582" style="width: 1170px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-664582 size-full" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GRS.jpg" sizes="(max-width: 1170px) 100vw, 1170px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GRS.jpg 1170w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GRS-300x179.jpg 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GRS-1024x613.jpg 1024w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GRS-768x459.jpg 768w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GRS-600x359.jpg 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GRS-150x90.jpg 150w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GRS-750x449.jpg 750w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GRS-1140x682.jpg 1140w" alt="" width="1170" height="700" data-pin-no-hover="true" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-664582" class="wp-caption-text">Source: T21 Business Intelligence with information from Semar.</figcaption></figure></figure>
<p><span dir="auto">An example of this is </span><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo, Colima, which remained the port with the most movements in November 2025, with a total of 323,989 TEUs</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , although it showed a decrease of 4% compared to the same month of the previous year.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">In the January-November period, the figure was negative. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo handled 3,547,352 TEUs, a decrease of 1.2% compared to 2014.</span></strong><span dir="auto"> It&#8217;s worth noting that the port has experienced some conflicts this year, such as the workers&#8217; strike last May.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Meanwhile, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas, in Michoacán, totaled 225,911 TEUs moved in November, a growth of 7.9%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> compared to the same month last year; however, in the accumulated total it moved two million 387 thousand 758 TEUs, a contraction of 1.6% compared to the same period in 2024.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">The Port of Veracruz reported 120,849 TEUs handled in the eleventh month of the year, a 4.6% increase compared to the same period in 2024</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , although the accumulated total reached 1,197,805 TEUs, a 0.2% decrease compared to the same period in 2024.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira, Tamaulipas, experienced the steepest decline. In November 2025, it closed with 64,610 TEUs, a drop of 15.4%</span></strong><span dir="auto"> ; while from January to November of this year, it reported the movement of 820,263 TEUs, a decrease of 1.7% compared to the same period in 2024.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Regarding the percentage of movements, during November, </span><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo accounted for 40.7% of container movement</span></strong><span dir="auto"> ; Lázaro Cárdenas 28.4%, Veracruz 15.2%, and Altamira 8.12% of the total operations.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_664585" class="wp-caption aligncenter" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-664585">
<p><figure id="attachment_664585" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-664585" style="width: 1170px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-664585 size-full" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Pastel.jpg" sizes="(max-width: 1170px) 100vw, 1170px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Pastel.jpg 1170w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Pastel-300x179.jpg 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Pastel-1024x613.jpg 1024w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Pastel-768x459.jpg 768w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Pastel-600x359.jpg 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Pastel-150x90.jpg 150w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Pastel-750x449.jpg 750w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Pastel-1140x682.jpg 1140w" alt="" width="1170" height="700" data-pin-no-hover="true" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-664585" class="wp-caption-text">Source: T21 Business Intelligence with information from Semar.</figcaption></figure></figure>
<p><span dir="auto">The performance of the country&#8217;s main ports in 2025 paints a contrasting picture. Overall, they show that, despite national growth of 2.2%, the most important ports face a year of adjustments and a loss of momentum, hence the marginal declines reflected in the cumulative figures.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on X:  </span><a href="https://twitter.com/GrupoT21"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/container-traffic-moderate-growth-and-decline-in-key-ports/">Container traffic: moderate growth and decline in key ports</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
