<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Port of Manzanillo. Port of Veracruz archivos - T21</title>
	<atom:link href="https://t21.us/tag/port-of-manzanillo-port-of-veracruz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://t21.us/tag/port-of-manzanillo-port-of-veracruz/</link>
	<description>The leading provider of news in the Transportation and Logistics Sector, including Air, Maritime, Land, and Railway, in Mexico and Latin America.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 16:02:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>May brings a respite to trucking in Mexican ports: ITPAP</title>
		<link>https://t21.us/may-brings-a-respite-to-trucking-in-mexican-ports-itpap/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T21 Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Maritime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Average Trucking Time Indicator at Ports (ITPAP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITPAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Altamira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Lázaro Cárdenas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Manzanillo. Port of Veracruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PORTS AND MERCHANT MARINE UNIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ports of Mexico]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://t21.us/?p=636573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>May marked a turning point for port productivity in Mexico. After four consecutive months of increases in the dwell times of trucking units transporting import containers, the Average Trucking Time Indicator in Ports (ITPAP) , compiled by T21 Business Intelligence , registered its first improvement of 2016, driven by a reduction in customs processing times and an operational recovery [&#8230;]</p>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/may-brings-a-respite-to-trucking-in-mexican-ports-itpap/">May brings a respite to trucking in Mexican ports: ITPAP</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-677205" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Puerto-de-Lazaro-Cardenas-11-edr.jpg" sizes="(max-width: 1170px) 100vw, 1170px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Puerto-de-Lazaro-Cardenas-11-edr.jpg 1170w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Puerto-de-Lazaro-Cardenas-11-edr-300x179.jpg 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Puerto-de-Lazaro-Cardenas-11-edr-1024x613.jpg 1024w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Puerto-de-Lazaro-Cardenas-11-edr-768x459.jpg 768w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Puerto-de-Lazaro-Cardenas-11-edr-600x359.jpg 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Puerto-de-Lazaro-Cardenas-11-edr-150x90.jpg 150w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Puerto-de-Lazaro-Cardenas-11-edr-750x449.jpg 750w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Puerto-de-Lazaro-Cardenas-11-edr-1140x682.jpg 1140w" alt="" width="1170" height="700" data-pin-no-hover="true" /></p>
<p><span dir="auto">May marked a turning point for port productivity in Mexico. After four consecutive months of increases in the dwell times of trucking units transporting import containers, the </span><strong><span dir="auto">Average Trucking Time Indicator in Ports (ITPAP)</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , compiled by </span><strong><span dir="auto">T21 Business Intelligence</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , registered its first improvement of 2016, driven by a reduction in customs processing times and an operational recovery particularly visible in Lázaro Cárdenas.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The average port turnaround time for a truck was </span><strong><span dir="auto">11 hours, 45 minutes, and 2 seconds in May</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , a decrease of 1 hour, 20 minutes, and 44 seconds compared to the 13 hours, 5 minutes, and 46 seconds recorded in April. This broke an upward trend that had persisted since the beginning of the year and had brought turnaround times to their highest level in April.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The improvement becomes even more significant when observing the cumulative behavior of the index during 2016. In January, the average time spent online was 8 hours, 47 minutes, and 33 seconds; by February, it had climbed to 11 hours, 9 minutes, and 20 seconds; in March, it reached 12 hours, 56 minutes, and 32 seconds; and in April, it reached 13 hours, 5 minutes, and 46 seconds. In other words, </span><strong><span dir="auto">during the first four months of the year, the average time spent online increased steadily</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , accumulating an increase of more than four hours compared to the beginning of the year.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_677172" class="wp-caption aligncenter" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-677172">
<p><figure id="attachment_677172" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-677172" style="width: 704px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-677172 size-full" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ITPAP-2026.png" sizes="(max-width: 704px) 100vw, 704px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ITPAP-2026.png 704w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ITPAP-2026-300x202.png 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ITPAP-2026-600x405.png 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/ITPAP-2026-150x101.png 150w" alt="" width="704" height="475" data-pin-no-hover="true" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-677172" class="wp-caption-text">Source: T21 Business Intelligence.</figcaption></figure></figure>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">For May, </span><strong><span dir="auto">ITPAP considered the measurement of 1,629 movements</span></strong><span dir="auto"> in the four ports it evaluates: Manzanillo, Lázaro Cárdenas, Altamira and Veracruz, the ones with the highest import movement of containers in the country.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">The improvement observed in May is primarily due to the performance of customs operations. The </span><strong><span dir="auto">average customs processing time</span></strong><span dir="auto"> at the four ports decreased from 6 hours, 25 minutes, and 42 seconds in April to 5 hours, 45 minutes, and 1 second in May—a reduction of more than 40 minutes. This component had been the main cause of the decline observed in previous months, increasing from 4 hours, 20 minutes, and 12 seconds in January to more than six hours during March and April.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Waiting times</span></strong><span dir="auto"> also contributed to the recovery. The average decreased from 3 hours, 48 ​​minutes, and 35 seconds to 3 hours, 24 minutes, and 14 seconds between April and May, while maneuvers improved from 2 hours, 51 minutes, and 29 seconds to 2 hours, 35 minutes, and 47 seconds. The combination of these three factors allowed for a partial reversal of the operational pressure accumulated during the first four months of the year.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_677173" class="wp-caption aligncenter" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-677173">
<p><figure id="attachment_677173" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-677173" style="width: 704px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-677173 size-full" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Abril-vs-mayo-2026.png" sizes="(max-width: 704px) 100vw, 704px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Abril-vs-mayo-2026.png 704w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Abril-vs-mayo-2026-300x202.png 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Abril-vs-mayo-2026-600x405.png 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Abril-vs-mayo-2026-150x101.png 150w" alt="" width="704" height="475" data-pin-no-hover="true" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-677173" class="wp-caption-text">Source: T21 Business Intelligence.</figcaption></figure><figcaption id="caption-attachment-677173" class="wp-caption-text"><strong style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;"><span dir="auto">Lázaro Cárdenas</span></strong><span dir="auto" style="font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;"> was the port that contributed most to the overall improvement in the index. The average dwell time decreased from 16 hours, 53 minutes, and 10 seconds in April to 13 hours, 34 minutes, and 23 seconds in May, a reduction of more than three hours. Similarly, the average time spent in customs decreased from 8 hours, 20 minutes, and 2 seconds to 6 hours, 35 minutes, and 54 seconds.</span></figcaption></figure>
<p><span dir="auto">This trend is significant because the Michoacán port had been the main driver of the decline recorded during the first months of the year. In fact, between January and April, average dwell times increased from 10 hours, 48 ​​minutes, and 43 seconds to almost 17 hours, making it </span><strong><span dir="auto">the port with the most strained performance</span></strong><span dir="auto"> among the four ports considered by ITPAP.</span></p>
<figure id="attachment_677174" class="wp-caption aligncenter" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-677174">
<p><figure id="attachment_677174" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-677174" style="width: 704px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-677174 size-full" src="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tiempo-promedio-en-puerto.png" sizes="(max-width: 704px) 100vw, 704px" srcset="https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tiempo-promedio-en-puerto.png 704w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tiempo-promedio-en-puerto-300x202.png 300w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tiempo-promedio-en-puerto-600x405.png 600w, https://t21.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tiempo-promedio-en-puerto-150x101.png 150w" alt="" width="704" height="475" data-pin-no-hover="true" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-677174" class="wp-caption-text">Source: T21 Business Intelligence.</figcaption></figure></figure>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">Manzanillo also registered an improvement</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , albeit a more moderate one. Its average port time decreased from 10 hours, 32 minutes, and 48 seconds in April to 10 hours, 21 minutes, and 33 seconds in May. </span><strong><span dir="auto">Veracruz</span></strong><span dir="auto"> showed a marginal reduction, while </span><strong><span dir="auto">Altamira</span></strong><span dir="auto"> was the only port that experienced an increase in its average port times during the analyzed period.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The recovery observed by ITPAP occurred in a context where container imports showed varying trends among ports. According to figures from the </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/puertosymarinamercante"><span dir="auto">Ports and Merchant Marine Unit (UPMM)</span></a><span dir="auto"> , between January and May 2026, Mexican ports handled </span><strong><span dir="auto">1.50 million TEUs (20-foot equivalent units) of imports</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , a decrease of 1.9% compared to the same period in 2025.</span></p>
<p><strong><span dir="auto">In the Pacific region, where Manzanillo and Lázaro Cárdenas</span></strong><span dir="auto"> are located , import container traffic remained virtually stable, with a decrease of just 0.9 percent. However, the results were contrasting at the individual port levels: Manzanillo saw a 3.8% increase, handling 717,929 TEUs, while Lázaro Cárdenas registered a 9.9% drop, with 275,256 TEUs. In the Gulf of Mexico, Altamira reported a 1.2% decrease and Veracruz a 2.9% decrease.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span dir="auto">While May does not return the indicator to the levels observed at the beginning of the year, it does represent the first respite for logistics chains linked to container imports.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span dir="auto">The reduction of more than one hour in </span><strong><span dir="auto">average dwell times</span></strong><span dir="auto"> suggests an improvement in the operational fluidity of the country&#8217;s main ports, although challenges still remain to recover the efficiency they showed at the beginning of 2026.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">The question now is whether this trend can be sustained during the second half of the year, </span><strong><span dir="auto">when the approach of the </span><em><span dir="auto">peak season</span></em><span dir="auto"> typically increases import volumes</span></strong><span dir="auto"> , boosts demand for land transport, and puts the operational capacity of ports, terminals, and customs to the test. The results of the coming months will determine whether the improvement observed in May was a temporary adjustment or the beginning of a more consistent recovery in trucking service times.</span></p>
<p><span dir="auto">Comment and follow us on LinkedIn:  </span><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/t21-grupo-comunicai-n-y-medios/"><span dir="auto">@GrupoT21</span></a></p>
<div class="jeg_ad jeg_ad_article jnews_content_inline_2_ads  ">
<div class="ads-wrapper align-center "></div>
</div>
<p>El cargo <a href="https://t21.us/may-brings-a-respite-to-trucking-in-mexican-ports-itpap/">May brings a respite to trucking in Mexican ports: ITPAP</a> apareció primero en <a href="https://t21.us">T21</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
