ITPAP confirms in June the operational recovery of Mexican ports ahead of the peak season

Operations at Mexico’s main ports began to show signs of recovery just as international trade prepares for the peak season. After four consecutive months of decline, the Average Trucking Time Indicator (ITPAP) , compiled by T21 Business Intelligence , registered a further decrease in June in the time that import trucks spend within port facilities to complete the cargo reception and dispatch cycle.

The average commute time decreased from 7 hours, 1 minute, and 7 seconds in May to 6 hours, 33 minutes, and 43 seconds in June . This reduction of 27 minutes and 24 seconds, equivalent to 6.5%, made June the best month of the first half of the year.

The indicator’s trajectory shows two clearly distinct phases. Between January and April, the average commute time increased by 4 hours, 18 minutes, and 13 seconds, equivalent to 48.9%, reaching its peak in April at 13 hours, 5 minutes, and 46 seconds. May marked the turning point, with a drop of 6 hours, 4 minutes, and 39 seconds compared to the previous month, and June continued the recovery.

Evolution of ITPAP in 2026

The improvement in June was distributed across the three components of the ITPAP: customs, handling, and waiting . The average time spent on customs processes decreased from 3 hours, 26 minutes, and 9 seconds in May to 3 hours, 13 minutes, and 12 seconds in June, a reduction of 12 minutes and 57 seconds.

Maneuvering time decreased from 1 hour, 33 minutes, and 52 seconds to 1 hour, 25 minutes, and 53 seconds, while waiting time decreased from 2 hours, 1 minute, and 5 seconds to 1 hour, 54 minutes, and 38 seconds. Although all three stages improved, customs remained the longest component of the port cycle.

May-June comparison

The simultaneous decrease in all three components offers a positive signal for the logistics chain ahead of the peak season , a period that traditionally sees increased pressure on terminals, customs, yards, and trucking services. However, the performance in the coming months will determine whether this recovery is sustainable as demand grows.

During June, 4,048 GPS movements were analyzed at the ports of Manzanillo, Lázaro Cárdenas, Altamira, and Veracruz, the only ports considered by ITPAP due to their importance within the National Port System. The number of movements corresponds exclusively to the monitored sample and does not represent the total number of operations at the four ports.

Lázaro Cárdenas reduces the time by more than an hour, but retains the most time.

Lázaro Cárdenas maintained the longest average stay among the ports evaluated in June, although it also registered one of the most significant improvements of the month. The average stay decreased from 9 hours, 31 minutes, and 19 seconds in May to 8 hours, 28 minutes, and 25 seconds in June.

The reduction was 1 hour, 2 minutes, and 54 seconds, equivalent to 11.0%, the second largest absolute decrease among the four venues. The result shows a significant recovery, but still leaves the Michoacán port almost two hours above the ITPAP average.

Lázaro Cárdenas: May-June comparison

The improvement was seen in all three components. Customs processing time was reduced by 29 minutes and 28 seconds , maneuvering time decreased by 15 minutes and 52 seconds, and waiting time was reduced by 17 minutes and 34 seconds.

The greatest savings were concentrated in customs, but this process continued to absorb nearly half of the port’s total processing time. In June, it reached 4 hours, 9 minutes, and 42 seconds , a period longer than the total processing time recorded by some ports at other times in the series.

The maneuvers also remained longer than those observed at the other facilities, while the wait exceeded two hours. Therefore, although the monthly reduction represents progress, Lázaro Cárdenas still has the greatest potential to expedite the land transport of goods.

Veracruz leads the monthly recovery

Veracruz registered the largest absolute and percentage reduction in June. Its average travel time decreased from 7 hours, 22 minutes, and 2 seconds in May to 6 hours, 15 minutes, and 26 seconds, a reduction of 1 hour, 6 minutes, and 36 seconds, equivalent to 15.1 percent.

The result placed the port below the June ITPAP average and reduced the gap with Altamira and Manzanillo , the two venues with the shortest times within the ITPAP.

Veracruz: May-June comparison

The improvement was widespread. Customs processing time decreased by 29 minutes and 45 seconds, maneuvering time decreased by 13 minutes and 12 seconds, and waiting time decreased by 23 minutes and 40 seconds.

In percentage terms, the largest reduction was in waiting times, with a drop of approximately 18.5%. Customs and handling decreased by about 13.9% and 13.2%, respectively.

Veracruz’s performance shows that the recovery did not depend solely on one stage of the process. The combined reduction of all three components allowed for a reduction of more than an hour in the total time and improved its ranking compared to the other ports analyzed.

Manzanillo and Altamira consolidate operational stability

While Lázaro Cárdenas and Veracruz led the port system’s recovery in June, registering the most significant reductions in their turnaround times, Manzanillo and Altamira remained virtually unchanged. Both ports maintained the lowest average turnaround times in the ITPAP (Port Turnaround Time Index), a sign that their operational performance held steady even after the upturn recorded in May.

The difference between the two groups of ports is significant. While the ports that had accumulated the most pressure during the first four months of the year began to recover efficiency, Manzanillo and Altamira confirmed that they operate on a more stable basis, with relatively small monthly variations and turnaround times below the national average.

Manzanillo maintains one of the best performances in the system

Manzanillo recorded an average travel time of 5 hours, 34 minutes, and 16 seconds in June , compared to 5 hours, 19 minutes, and 10 seconds in May. The increase was 15 minutes and 6 seconds, equivalent to 4.7 percent.

Although it was the only port that showed a monthly increase, it continued to rank among the facilities with the shortest stay of the monitored units and remained almost an hour below the national average.

Manzanillo: May-June comparison

Manzanillo’s monthly increase was primarily due to changes in customs processing times and wait times. Customs processing times rose from 2 hours, 36 minutes, and 49 seconds in May to 2 hours, 43 minutes, and 36 seconds in June, while wait times increased from 1 hour, 31 minutes, and 8 seconds to 1 hour, 37 minutes, and 43 seconds. Maneuvering times showed a smaller variation of just 1 minute and 43 seconds. Even with this adjustment, the port maintained one of the lowest average processing times in the ITPAP (Port of Ports Administration Report) and remained almost an hour below the average.

Altamira reaffirms its operational leadership

Altamira once again had the lowest average ITPAP transit time of any port . In June, it recorded 5 hours, 19 minutes, and 46 seconds, just 1 minute and 24 seconds more than in May, when it reported 5 hours, 18 minutes, and 22 seconds.

The variation was only 0.4%, the lowest among the four ports evaluated, confirming a highly consistent operational behavior.

Altamira: May-June comparison

Although the overall average processing time at Altamira increased by only 1 minute and 24 seconds between May and June, the behavior of its components shows a different dynamic. Customs processing remained virtually unchanged, with a reduction of only 10 seconds, while maneuvering times decreased by 5 minutes and 2 seconds. However, this improvement was offset by an increase of 6 minutes and 36 seconds in waiting times, leaving the port’s overall performance virtually unchanged.

This behavior confirms the operational stability of Altamira, which remained the venue with the lowest average ITPAP time during June.

Two dynamics explain the system’s recovery

The behavior in June shows that the improvement in the indicator did not follow a homogeneous trend.

On the one hand, Lázaro Cárdenas and Veracruz led the recovery by significantly reducing their stay times, correcting some of the deterioration accumulated during the first four months of the year.

On the other hand, Manzanillo and Altamira maintained stable performance, with times that continued to be the lowest in the system. This combination explains the decrease in the ITPAP average and reflects a more balanced operating scenario as the peak international trade season approaches.

However, when the indicator is broken down, a common pattern persists in the four ports: customs continues to be the process that accounts for the majority of the time spent by import units.

Where is attention span concentrated? (June 2026)

In all four ports, customs processing accounts for nearly half of the total time trucks spend within the port area. This share ranges from 48.9% to 49.5%, a minimal difference that confirms customs remains the primary driver of operational productivity, regardless of the port analyzed.

Overall, the June results indicate that the Mexican port system is entering the peak season in better shape . After registering its worst performance of the year in April, the ITPAP has now seen two consecutive months of recovery, demonstrating simultaneous improvements in customs processes, handling, and waiting times.

The challenge for the second half of the year will no longer be simply maintaining the downward trend observed in May and June, but demonstrating that the port system can absorb the seasonal increase in cargo without returning to the congestion levels recorded during the first four months. The peak season will test whether the recovery observed by ITPAP represents a structural change in operations or merely a temporary improvement before the surge in demand.

During June 2026, the indicator was compiled using a sample of 4,048 movements. Therefore, the results reflect only the behavior of the monitored operations and not the total universe of port movements.

Delays also have a cost for trucking.

Although operational performance varies between ports and periods, the reality is that none of the country’s major port facilities are immune to episodes of saturation, congestion, or operational complexities that ultimately affect the flow of trucking. Beyond the amount of time a tractor-trailer spends inside the port, these conditions directly impact the productivity of trucking companies, increase their operating costs, and reduce the capacity available to serve the market.

An analysis prepared by T21 Business Intelligence , with information provided by trucking companies, shows that delays recorded at ports generate economic losses that transcend carriers and end up being reflected throughout the logistics chain.

In the case of Altamira, the companies consulted estimate that the delays could reduce the productivity of their units by up to 30% . Considering the average monthly revenue per tractor-trailer and a flow of approximately three thousand daily entries to the port, the economic impact of lost productivity could exceed nine billion pesos per month.

The problem is not unique to one port. Extrapolating the analysis to Manzanillo, Lázaro Cárdenas, Veracruz, and Altamira, the country’s four main commercial ports, reveals that more than 10,000 trucks enter daily , meaning that any increase in service times has a multiplier effect on equipment availability, driver utilization, and logistics costs.

In Manzanillo, for example, the transport companies consulted indicate that the delays force them, on average, to add 7.5 additional double-trailer trucks to maintain the same level of service. Beyond the additional investment in assets, this situation means that existing units stop generating revenue, which, in total, translates to more than two billion pesos in lost sales.

Data from the Top 100 Trucking® report , compiled by Grupo T21, supports this loss of productivity. While the average monthly mileage of the country’s leading companies reaches 13,125 kilometers per unit, and some even exceed 25,000 kilometers, there are companies whose operations are highly concentrated in ports and whose tractor-trailers barely travel between 5,000 and 8,000 kilometers per month, reflecting the time they remain idle waiting to complete their operational cycle.

Comment and follow us on LinkedIn: @GrupoT21